Indiana Court Rules That Pharmacy Doesn't Have Duty to Warn
Lawyers USA (October 10, 2005)
Author: Lawyers Weekly Usa Staff
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/68871467
Id. vLex: VLEX-68871467
Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días
A pharmacy had no duty to warn a customer of the potential side effects of a drug, the Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled.
The plaintiff purchased a prescription drug used to treat impotence from his pharmacy. After injecting the drug, the plaintiff experienced an erection which lasted almost 72 hours and ultimately required surgery.Indiana Court Rules That Pharmacy Doesn't Have Duty to Warn
He sued the pharmacy, alleging that it failed to provide him with any warn...
Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
- Constitutions
- Forms and Contracts
- Legal Books and Journals
- Case Law
- News and Business
- Regulations
- U.S. Code
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access
If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here
Other documents:
Bible Maintains Man's Need for Reconciliation |
state ex rel knox v indus comm ohio 1995
|
decisão monocrática nº 70032546053 of tribunal de justiça do rs décima quarta câmara cíve... |
Processo Nº 26396/026/97 of Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Sao Paulo Segunda Camara of August 20 2001
|
Decisao Monocratica N 2007/0061605-1 of Superior Tribunal de Justica - Quart... |
'El corazon es lo mas importante' |
resolucao n 1470/2002
|
Acuerdo Nº 932341100 of 4ª Câmara (Extinto 1° TAC), of June 07, 2000
|
arrete du 6 mars 2003 portant nomination dans les fonctions de chef de service
|
Batalla con la Xunta de una mujer con un hijo y un nieto discapacitados |
Light-line naamloze vennootschap Kuurnsestraat 11 8531 Hulste H.R Kortrijk 114230 BTW 432...
