Acme Boat Rentals, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. Ray Mcdermott & Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, v. Freeport Sulphur Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee., 407 F.2d 1324 (5th Cir. 1969)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (February 25, 1969)

Docket number: 26835


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/acme-rentals-mcdermott-freeport-sulphur-36734730
Id. vLex: VLEX-36734730

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Capeletti Brothers, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. Local # 487 International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, Defendants-Appellants Cross-Appellees., 514 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Acme Boat Rentals, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. Ray Mcdermott & Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, v. Freeport Sulphur Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee., 424 F.2d 393 (5th Cir. 1970)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Colonial Penn Insurance, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Market Planners Insurance Agency Inc., Jimmy Whited, Defendants-Appellants., 157 F.3d 1032 (5th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. the City of Dallas, Et Al., Defendants, the City of Dallas, Defendant-Appellant., 958 F.2d 85 (5th Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants., 500 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - in Re Incident Aboard the D/B Ocean King on August 30, 1980. Cities Service Company and Getty Oil Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. Ocean Drilling and Exploration Company and Odeco, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, Hydril Company, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant., 758 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Houma Well Service Et Al., Defendants, and Eva C. Fontenot, Intervenor- Appellant., 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Ethelyn Gilbert Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. W. L. Sterrett, Dallas County Judge, Et Al., Etc., Defendants-Appellees., 509 F.2d 1389 (5th Cir. 1975)

Text:

Edmond C. Salassi, New Orleans, La., of Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.

Charles E. Lugenbuhl, Bruce J. Borrello, New Orleans, La., Maurice C. Hebert, Jr., New Orleans, La., for Acme Boat Rentals, Inc., appellee; Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer, Matthews & Schumacher, New Orleans, La., of counsel.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of the Court, this case has been placed on the summary calendar for disposition without oral argument.1

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court sitting without a jury. The judgment was rendered without a statement of either findings of fact or conclusions of law. Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states: "In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon * * *." Such findings of fact and conclusions of law are mandatory and must be sufficient in detail and exactness to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate conclusion reached by the court. S.S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965, 353 F.2d 545; Mladinich v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 371 F.2d 940.

The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for findings of fact and conclusions of law not inconsistent with Rule 52(a) and the decisions of this court. Cf. Myles v. Quinn Menhaden Fisheries, Inc., 5 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 146, on form of findings and conclusions.

Vacated and remanded.

Notes:

1 In order to establish a docket control procedure, the Fifth Circuit adopted new Rules 17-20 on December 6, 1968. See Wittner v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1165 [slip opinion dated January 23, 1969], Fn. 1 and Appendix thereto

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access