• See other documents that cite the same legislation

Addition of a Pollutant and Division of a Natural Body of Water: Should There be a New Math for NPDES Permits Under the Clean Water Act?

The Everglades are an American treasure on par with the Grand Canyon, Yellowstone, and California's ancient redwoods. There is no other place else like them in the world. But the Everglades are dying. And if we do not act now, we may very well lose the opportunity to save them for future generations.1

I. Introduction

The Everglades National Park (the Everglades) is a vibrant and dazzling ecosystem that supports an extensive plant life and a "wealth of fish, lobsters, shrimp, bass, catfish, alligators, and numerous other animals."2 This environmental marvel, located in southern Florida, is currently subject to increased pollution caused by elevated phosphorous levels, disrupted water flow, and extensive water controls that were developed within the past fifty years.3 Only recently has the federal government and the State of Florida recognized the degradation4 In response, "comprehensive and expensive environmental protection plan[s]" have been developed to "rebalance the Everglades' ecosystem."5

The water control systems were developed, in part, to control flooding in residential areas.6 These systems collect stormwater and agricultural runoff to prevent areas of Broward County, Florida, from flooding.7 A portion of the collected water is then pumped into a water conservation area of the Everglades.8 Unfortunately, the collected waters contain pollutants, and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) pumps these already polluted waters into a water conservation area that has lower concentration of those pollutants.9 While the entire area was historically and hydrologically one body of water, many parts of the Everglades are now separated by extensive systems of canals, basins, levees, and pumping stations.10 In an effort to combat the increased pollutant levels in the Everglades, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians (the Tribe) and the Friends of the Everglades together filed suit against the SFWMD to force the water management district to acquire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under the Clean Water Act.11

Part II discusses the Everglades' overall geomorphic history and development as a natural water body that was historically, or hydrologically, one "sheet" of water. Additionally, it will discuss the development and destruction of the Everglades over the past century, focusing on the current water controls that introduce already polluted water into a water conservation area of the Everglades. Part III will review the procedural history of the case and the Supreme Court's holdings.

Part IV is divided into various subsections in order to analyze the legal arguments in Miccosukee I. It will discuss the initial development of the Clean Water Act (CWA),12 the legislative intent behind the CWA, and specifically, the NPDES permitting system under the CWA and its progression. Part IV will also review what constitutes an "addition of any pollutant"13 and consider whether it matters if the already polluted water is merely conveyed. It will discuss historically connected water bodies and whether they are forever one body of water or whether they can, at some point, become separate and distinct bodies of water. Ultimately, Part IV will indicate whether water management districts and the like are exempt from the requirement to obtain a NPDES permit.

Part V discusses the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision and possible subsequent holdings on remand. It will cover the burdens imposed upon SFWMD, other water management districts, and other municipalities if they are required to get a NPDES permit to "discharge" water that they are merely conveying from one area to another hydrologically connected area. Part V will discuss cost increases in managing water or providing clean water, and the possible increase in taxpayer costs. Part V will also discuss the impact on the Everglades, pristine areas, and the national environment if no NPDES permit is required. It will speak to the potential pollution of clean water, increased costs of cleaning and protecting waters, the increased environmental damage caused by polluting, and ultimately, the damage to flora, fauna, animals, and habitats.

The SFWMD ultimately believes that because it is merely transporting already polluted water, and historically the water bodies were connected, it is not "adding" a pollutant "from a point source," and thus it is not required by the CWA to obtain a NPDES permit.14 However-in light o...

If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here