California Is At It Again: A Dozen New Laws Will Significantly Impact The State's Employers
United States Law Articles in English (2008)
- Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/again-dozen-will-significantly-employers-29351256
Id. vLex: VLEX-29351256
Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días
U.S. Supreme Court - Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 (2001)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc.; Lapine Technology Corporation; Lapine Holding Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee. v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees., 341 F.3d 987 (9th Cir. 2003) Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc.; Lapine Technology Corporation; Lapine Holding Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee. v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
California Is At It Again: A Dozen New Laws Will Significantly Impact The State's Employers
By Stephen Berry, Shelby Angulo & Stephen HarrisCalifornia voters overwhelmingly responded to a key theme in the recent gubernatorial recall campaign - to heal California's ailing economy in part by eliminating laws and regulations that drive business, and therefore, jobs out of the state. The Legislature apparently was not listening as it passed a dozen new employment-related laws that, for the most part, impose additional responsibilities, burdens and costs on California employers. Despite the urgings of Governor-elect Schwarzenegger that he veto many of these laws, Governor Davis signed nearly all of them. All but two of the laws take effect on January 1, 2004. The exceptions are AB 205, which takes effect on January 1, 2005 and SB 2, which takes effect over two years, starting January 1, 2006. This article highlights the changes resulting from the recently-completed legislative session. Paul Hastings is presenting complimentary seminars on the many practical interpretation and compliance questions these laws evoke. For dates, locations, and to register, please go to www.paulhastings.com, select 'News', and click on 'Seminars'.SENATE BILL 727 (Paid Family Leave)This law amends SB 1661, which was passed last year and created a new disability compensation program called "Family Temporary Disability Insurance" (FTDI). AB 727 renames this government-provided (employee-paid) benefit "Paid Family Leave" (PFL) and makes other "conforming and clarifying changes" to the laws enacted as part of SB 1661. Currently, the State Disability Insurance (SDI) program provides temporary disability compensation for employees who cannot work due to a non-work related injury or illness and who are not c...
Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
- Constitutions
- Forms and Contracts
- Legal Books and Journals
- Case Law
- News and Business
- Regulations
- U.S. Code
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access
If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here
