* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .

R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31108 Summary Calendar DELLA ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CV-2916 July 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Della Alexander appeals from the judgment affirming the CommissionerÂ’s denial of her application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. She contends that the opinion of her treating psychiatrist was not accorded sufficient weight and consideration and that the Administrative Law Judge committed reversible error in failing to complete a form for mental health evaluation.

When read in its entirety, the ALJÂ’s decision indicates that the opinion of AlexanderÂ’s treating psychiatrist was considered and rejected in favor of several other medical opinions. The ALJ is free to reject the opinion of any physician when the evidence supports a contrary conclusion. Moore v. Sullivan , 919 F.2d 901, 905 (5th Cir. 1990). The ALJ did not commit reversible error in determining that the opinions of other physicians were more credible or reliable than that of AlexanderÂ’s treating psychiatrist. Id .; see also Carrier v. Sullivan , 944 F.2d 243, 247 (5th Cir. 1991). Because Alexander has not shown how her substantial rights were affected, the ALJÂ’s failure to complete a Psychiatric Review Technique Form is not grounds for reversal. See Mays v. Bowen , 837 F.2d 1362, 1364 (5th Cir. 1988). AFFIRMED.

No. 97-31108