Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Alfred G. Dupuis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret Heckler; Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee., 762 F.2d 1006 (6th Cir. 1985)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (April 10, 1985)

Docket number: 84-1192


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/alfred-dupuis-margaret-heckler-human-37071369
Id. vLex: VLEX-37071369

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Joseph Thomas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee., 800 F.2d 1024 (11th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Christopher A. Burger, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee., 785 F.2d 890 (11th Cir. 1986) Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Roger Collins, Petitioner/Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent/Appellee, Cross-Appellant., 792 F.2d 987 (11th Cir. 1986) Petitioner/Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent/Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

U.S. Supreme Court - Rose v. Clark, 478 U.S. 570 (1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - John Merlo, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dan L. Bolden, Respondent-Appellant., 801 F.2d 252 (6th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Arthur J. Burton, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dale E. Foltz, Respondent-Appellee., 810 F.2d 118 (6th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Washita Construction Company, and Billy Ray Anthony, Defendants-Appellants., 789 F.2d 809 (10th Cir. 1986)

Text:

Before: JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges; BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing filed herein by the plaintiff-appellant, the Court finds that material new evidence exists and that there was good cause for the plaintiff-appellant's failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in the prior proceedings. See Wilson v. Secretary, 733 F.2d 1181 (6th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the Court concludes that the petition for rehearing shall be GRANTED, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec . 405(g), the opinion of this court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with directions to remand the case to the Secretary for the taking of additional evidence.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and it is hereby GRANTED.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access