Alfred Windom, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Thomas Cook, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant., 423 F.2d 721 (5th Cir. 1970)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (February 25, 1970)

Docket number: 28116


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/alfred-windom-cook-mississippi-penitentiary-36741561
Id. vLex: VLEX-36741561

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Sidney Ray Wilkerson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 78-2862. Summary Calendar. [Fn*], 591 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1979)

U.S. Supreme Court - Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (1973)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Wilbert Herring, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee., 491 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Marion Mason, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles Balcom, Superintendent, Montgomery Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellant., 531 F.2d 717 (5th Cir. 1976)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Willie Lee Henderson, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Lewis S. Tollett, Warden, Brushy Mountain State Farm, Respondent-Appellant., 459 F.2d 237 (6th Cir. 1972)

Text:

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. of Mississippi, Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for respondent-appellant.

James A. Lewis, Armand Derfner, Jackson, Miss., for petitioner-appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Windom, a state prisoner, pleaded guilty to charges of burglary and assault with intent to commit rape. He filed a habeas corpus petition in the District Court alleging involuntariness of the plea by virtue of the ineffectiveness of the assistance of his counsel. The District Court granted the writ. We affirm.

Windom's court appointed counsel testified that his only conference with Windom, which came just prior to the arraignment proceeding at which the guilty plea was entered, lasted for a period of between fifteen and thirty minutes. He did not discuss the elements of the crimes charged with Windom and he did not make an effort to find out the facts of the case either by asking Windom what had happened or by speaking with the alleged victims or the prosecuting attorney.

On this basis alone, the record reflects the ineffectiveness of counsel. "Effective counsel includes familiarity of counsel with the case and an opportunity to investigate it if necessary in order meaningfully to advise the accused of his options." (Citations omitted) Calloway v. Powell, 5 Cir. 1968, 393 F.2d 886, 888. Counsel was not in a position to advise Windom prior to allowing him to plead guilty because he was unfamiliar with the case. Furthermore, counsel allowed Windom to plead guilty without advising him of the fact that he could attack the composition of the grand jury which indicted him when everyone, including counsel, knew that Negroes had been systematically excluded therefrom.

The order of the District Court granting the writ of habeas corpus is Affirmed.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access