United States of America, Appellee, v. Dale Scott Hunnewell, Defendant, Appellant., 855 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1988)

Federal Circuits, 1st Cir. (August 22, 1988)

Docket number: 88-8050

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/america-dale-scott-hunnewell-defendant-38450320
Id. vLex: VLEX-38450320

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff- Appellee, v. Michael Hailey, Defendant- Appellant., 257 F.3d 1162 (10th Cir. 2001)

United States Law Articles in English - Class Action Arbitration: The Green Tree Decision and Other Recent Developments

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Seguro de Servicio de Salud de Puerto Rico, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Mcauto Systems Group, Inc., Defendant, Appellee (Two Cases). Appeal of Advanced System Applications, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Seguro de Servicio de Salud de Puerto Rico, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Mcauto Systems Group, Inc., Defendant, Appellee. Appeal of Advanced System Applications, Inc., Defendant. Seguro de Servicio de Salud de Puerto Rico, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Mcauto Systems Group, Inc., Et Al., Defendants, Appellees., 878 F.2d 5 (1st Cir. 1989) Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Mcauto Systems Group, Inc., Defendant, Appellee (Two Cases). Appeal of Advanced System Applications, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Seguro de Servicio de Salud de Puerto Rico, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Mcauto Systems Group, Inc., Defendant, Appellee. Appeal of Advanced System Applications, Inc., Defendant. Seguro de Servicio de Salud de Puerto Rico, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Mcauto Systems Group, Inc., Et Al., Defendants, Appellees.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Unpublished Disposition Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(B)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used as Precedent Except To Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit. Richard J. Galuska, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 929 F.2d 703 (7th Cir. 1991)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Keystone Shipping Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. New England Power Company, Defendant-Appellee., 109 F.3d 46 (1st Cir. 1997)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Leroy Baesler, Ray Bieber, Tim Bieber, Robert Bleick, Bill Christman, Russel Doe, Bill Eikamp, Bruce Erickson, Lennis Erickson, John Fiedler, Bruce Hagen, Earl Hagen, Arne Harsch, Willard Harsch, Richard Hintz, Rick Hintz, Wayne Hoherz, John Homelvig, Lloyd Honeyman, Lynn Honeyman, Ryan Honeyman, Reiny Horst, Darrell Jalbert, Dale Johnson, Ben Kautzman, Troy Kautzman, Daniel Kelsch, Dean Kelsch, James Kerzman, Ken Kibbel, August Kirschmann, Oscar Klein, Dennis Knutson, Myron Larson, Monty Larson, Terry Laufer, Richard Lutz, Meier Bros., Frank Miller, Terry Miller, Henry Miller, Lyle Narum, Wayne Narum, Ron Nester, Harvey Oase, Ellsworth Olson, Brian Papka, Lowell Prince, Ron Reich, Duane Rose, Fred Schaar, Mark Schaar, Robert Schackow, Donald Schaible, Paul Schwartz, Danny Schwarzwalter, Wes Schwarzwalter, Elmer Solseth, Marley Sprecher, Trevor Strand, Kerry Swindler, Leslie Swindler, Marion Swindler, Ronald Swindler, Henry Texley, Jack Volk, John Wegner, Melvin Wegner, Werner Zent, Appellants, v. Contine..., 900 F.2d 1193 (8th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Acting Through the United Kingdom Defense Procurement Office, Ministry of Defense, Petitioners-Appellees, v. the Boeing Company, Boeing Defense & Space Group, Helicopters Division, Formerly Known as Boeing Vertol Company, Respondents-Appellants, Textron, Inc., Respondent., 998 F.2d 68 (2nd Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Alvin Champ and Esther Perera, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Mal Yerasi and Stephen B. Geer, Intervenors-Appellees, Cross-Intervenors/Appellants, v. the Siegel Trading Company, Inc., Howard Siegel and Frank Mazza, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees., 55 F.3d 269 (7th Cir. 1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Securities Industry Association, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Michael J. Connolly, Etc., Et Al., Defendants, Appellants., 883 F.2d 1114 (1st Cir. 1989)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BOWNES and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appellant's "petition for permission to appeal" is denied. A district court's interlocutory denial of a motion to dismiss for violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U.S.C.App. § 1 et seq., is not an appealable order. United States v. Cejas, 817 F.2d 595, 596 (9th Cir. 1987). Such an order is not "effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment" under the third prong of the three-prong test for the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule restated in Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 265, 104 S.Ct. 1051, 1055, 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984). "Because of the compelling interest in prompt trials, the Court has interpreted the requirements of the collateral-order exception to the final judgment rule with the utmost strictness in criminal cases." Id.

The petition is denied.

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /