United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Richards, Defendant-Appellant., 646 F.2d 962 (5th Cir. 1981)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (June 01, 1981)

Docket number: 78-5728

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/america-raymond-richards-defendant-38392763
Id. vLex: VLEX-38392763

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ben Herbert Sutherland, Defendant-Appellant., 428 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir. 1970)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Bobby Lee Moore, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 598 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1979)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - in the Matter of Ben Novack, Bankrupt. Ben Novack, Appellant, v. R. C. Gardner, Jr., and Larry Gilbert, Trustees, Appellees. in the Matter of Bleaufontaine, Inc., Bankrupt. Bleaufontaine, Inc., Appellant, v. R. C. Gardner and Larry Gilbert, Trustees, Appellees. in the Matter of Bluevack, Inc., Bankrupt. Bluevack, Inc., Appellant, v. R. C. Gardner, Jr. and Larry Gilbert, Trustees, Appellees. in the Matter of Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation, Bankrupt. Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation, Appellant, v. R. C. Gardner, Jr. and Larry Gilbert, Trustees, Appellees., 639 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1981)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Guy James Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. Trinity Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee., 650 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon Bustos-Guzman, Pedro Benara-Agamez, Luis Enrique Diaz-Nunoz, Victor Manuel Barrantes, Defendants-Appellants., 685 F.2d 1278 (11th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Sun Cha Byrd, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tommy Clark, Clifford Black, Larry Collins, Joey Whitley, Drew Solomon, and the City of Fitzgerald, Georgia, Defendants-Appellees., 783 F.2d 1002 (11th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Rackley, Randall T. Crosby, Defendants-Appellants., 724 F.2d 1463 (11th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Martinez; Jorge Gomez; Humberto Gallo, Defendants-Appellants., 96 F.3d 473 (11th Cir. 1996)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 103, 16 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 326 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Rackley, Randall T. Crosby, Defendants-Appellants., 742 F.2d 1266 (11th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Fiallo-Jacome, Defendant-Appellant., 874 F.2d 1479 (11th Cir. 1989)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raphael R. Levy, Defendant-Appellant., 379 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2004)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - USA v. Raphael R. Levy (11th Cir. 2004)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Thompson, Steven Barfield, and Kim Williams, Defendants-Appellees., 710 F.2d 1500 (11th Cir. 1983)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Linda Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981, 638 F.2d 765).

In his application for rehearing, Richards questions the statutory authority of the DEA agents to make a warrantless extended border search. Whether the search was valid as a border search was an issue raised in the trial court, in the briefs filed in this Court and before the panel on oral argument. The district court, relying in part on the concept of border searches, upheld the warrantless search. Similarly, the panel opinion upheld the search as a valid extended border search. At no time before filing his application for rehearing did Richards question the statutory authority of the DEA agents to conduct a border search.

Generally, an appellate court does not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. In the Matter of Novak, 639 F.2d 1274, 1276 (5th Cir. 1981). Moreover, absent exceptional circumstances we do not consider issues that are first presented in an application for rehearing. Moore v. United States, 598 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Sutherland, 428 F.2d 1152, 1158 (1970), appeal after remand, 463 F.2d 641 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1078 , 93 S.Ct. 698, 34 L.Ed.2d 668 (1977) ("Having tried and appealed its case on one theory, an unsuccessful party may not then use a petition for rehearing as a device to test a new theory.") In light of the repeated opportunities to raise the issue of the statutory validity of the search and the nature of the claim, no exceptional circumstances are here presented.

Therefore, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

GODBOLD, Chief Judge, dissents.

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /