United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Antonio Santia-Manriquez and Alfredo Santiago-Rodriguez, Defendants-Appellees., 609 F.2d 1162 (5th Cir. 1980)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (January 15, 1980)

Docket number: 78-2940


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/antonio-santia-manriquez-alfredo-santiago-36945151
Id. vLex: VLEX-36945151

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry William Henke, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-2183. Summary Calendar., 775 F.2d 641 (5th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Connors Karo, Richard Miles Horton, William Robertson Harley, Michael Gaylord Steele, Evan Roth, Gene R. Rhodes, Defendants-Appellees., 710 F.2d 1433 (10th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Energy Mgt. P 26,436 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Uni Oil, Inc., Defendant, Thomas M. 'Mick' Hajecate, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 710 F.2d 1078 (5th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter Kreimes, Defendant-Appellant., 649 F.2d 1185 (5th Cir. 1981)

Text:

LeRoy M. Jahn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Lawrence L. Barber, Jr., Monahans, Tex., for Santia-Manriquez.

Jerry McGowen, III, Pecos, Tex., for Santiago-Rodriguez.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before GOLDBERG, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The Government has pointed out that United States v. McInnis, 601 F.2d 1319, 1323 (5th Cir. 1979), reached a different conclusion than our original opinion in this case, 603 F.2d 575, 577 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1979) (per curiam), on whether the thirty-day period during which the Government must file a notice of appeal under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b) begins as of the date of an oral order or as of the date of the written order.

Accordingly, we delete the last two sentences of the first paragraph of the opinion and footnote one. In their place, the following sentences should be inserted at the end of the first paragraph: "On October 4, 1978, the district court handed down a written order embodying its July 28 verbal order, so both appeals are timely under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b). United States v. McInnis, 601 F.2d 1319, 1323 (5th Cir. 1979). We find the district court's ruling to be correct and affirm."

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access