Ballot Access Restrictions: Void as Against Public Policy?

The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice - Nbr. 9-1, October 2005

Kevin Stokes
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/ballot-access-restrictions-void-against-445639
Id. vLex: VLEX-445639

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Previous | Nbr. 9-1, October 2005 | Next

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

I. Introduction A. The Sixth District Controversy B. The Council's Imposition ola Credit Check Waiver C. The ConstitutionalIssue II. Defining Ballot Access Restrictions III. Determining Unconstitutional Ballot Access Restrictions A. Infringement upon Free Association 1. The Voting Rights Act Recognizes the Voting Association Bloc of Minority Voters in Compact Districts 2. Richmond's Ballot Access Restriction Stymies Application of the Voting Rights Act. B. Furtherance of Governmental Interest 1. Electoral Integrity 2. Financial Independence and Disinterest 3. Richmond's Ballot Access Restriction Arguably Serves Legitimate Governmental Interests. C. The Balance 1. Rational, Non-discriminatory Restrictions Face Low-Level Scrutiny 2. Burdensome Restrictions Face Strict Scrutiny 3. Richmond's Restriction Would Be Subject to Minimal Scrutiny 4. Richmond's Restriction Wmild Survive Minimal Scrutiny IV. Understanding Policy Considerations A. Virginia's History of Race-Based Electoral Discrimination B. Class-Based Discrimination in Virginia's Electoral History VI. Proposed Balancing Test VII. Conclusion

Citations:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - George R. ("Tex") Wood, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce Meadows, Secretary of the State Board of Elections, Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendant-Appellee., 207 F.3d 708 (4th Cir. 2000)

US Code - Title 42: The Public Health and Welfare - 42 USC 1973 - Sec. 1973. Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color through voting qualifications or prerequisites; establishment of violation

U.S. Supreme Court - Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 525 U.S. 182 (1999)

U.S. Supreme Court - Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 520 U.S. 351 (1997)

U.S. Supreme Court - Voinovich v. Quilter, 507 U.S. 146 (1993)


See all quotations

Extract:

Ballot Access Restrictions: Void as Against Public Policy?

Kevin Stokes, Thank you to Sterling Stokes, Patrice Stokes, and the staff of The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice for their continued support and assistance, both to and throughout this Note's development.

I. Introduction

Scandal has plagued the Richmond City Council (Council) for the past quarter of a century. In 1978, financially distressed councilman, Raymond Royall, staged a drowning death and later reemerged in Sl. Louis, Missouri.1 That same year councilman-elect William Golding relinquished his seat on the Council upon learning that his teenage felonies barred him from holding public office.2

Unfortunately, the passage of time did not ameliorate the controversies surrounding the Council. In fact, the 1990s saw further scandal. Particularly, the year 1996 bore horrors for three councilpersons. To begin, councilman Chuck Richardson, a convicted heroin-user, "served more than a year in jail . .. for refusing to identify suppliers."3 Councilwoman Shirley Harvey neglected to pay utilities bills for rented,. city-condemned property.4 Additionally, councilman Larry Chavis became mayor-elect days before the public announcement that his trucking company owed a quarter ofa million dollars in back taxes.5

Scandals continued. In 1999, councilman-mayor Leonidas Young faced conviction on two counts: "influence peddling as mayor in the mid-1990s and of fraud as pastor of Fourth Baptist Church.,,6 In addition, councilwoman Reva Trammell acted contrary to the city charter in 2001, instructing a city police officer not to report her quarrel with another officer who allegedly struck her.7 Thus veering away from the road to recovery and improvement, the Council traversed the road ofpolitical stagnation.

A. The Sixth District Controversy

Such polítical scandals raised public distrust and caused both the media and voters to pay particular attention to vacancies on the Council. In February 2003, a grand jury indicted Sixth District councilman Sa'ad El-Amin on nineteen counts, including tax evasion and fraud.8 EI-Arnin pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States.9 His conviction, subsequent sentence to federal prison, and official resignation created a vacancy on the City Council.10 A month later, the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested councilwoman Gwen Hedgepeth for allegedly accepting a $2000 bribe for her vote on a pending appointment to replace councilman EI-Amin's seat,11 Less than a month later, a grandjuryindictedher on charges ofaccepting abribe and lying to FBI agents.12 As a result, insurmountable public criticism and disillusionment eroded public confidence in the Council's ability to mandate candidacy requirements for appointment to the Sixth DistriCt,13

B. The Council's Impositionofa Credit Check Waiver

. The circumstances surrounding the Council's appointment proeedure to the Sixth Distriet Couneil seat roused further controversy. The Council required all applicants seeking appointment to submit personal information.14 The Council required the same for the Fourth District seat, which was left vacant after a councilman's fatal heart attack,15 The revised application procedure required applicants to submit resumes and consent to background investigations,16 which were to be executed by the Cíty of Richmond17 The background investigations provided, in relevant part, for the investigation of applicants' credit histories.18

The background investigation, particularly the required consent to a credit check, drew public attack and press attention.19 The public's main complaint was the creation of double standards and excessive authority in contravention of the city charter.20 For instance, former councilwoman Shirley Harvey voiced concern that the Council subjected applicants to criminal background and credit history investigati...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
Edicto de solicitud de licencia municipal para apertura de guarderia de vehiculos Expte 5553/07 | Stockton Perfect Point Guard a Fierce Floor General | Arrêté du 8 février 2001 portant réintégration et affectation (tribunaux administratifs et cou... | Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Elementary and secondary education— College Assistance Migrant ... | « dagy », burgerlijke vennootschap onder de vorm van een naamloze vennootschap, koningstraat 215, te... | 5 septembre 2001 - arrete royal portant agrement d institutions culturelles pour l application de l article 104 3 d du code des impots sur les revenus 1992 ... | Acordao n 9140409 of Tribunal da Relacao do Porto, of October 16, 1991 | Ovotex, naamloze vennootschap, Hoogstraat 132, 8540 Deerlijk H.R. Kortrijk 130108 BTW 450.391.388 De aandeelhouders worden vriend... | entscheidungstext 4ob517/92 oberster gerichtshof february 18 1992 | Acórdão Nº 282249 of Primeira Turma, of February 04, 2005 | LONDRES Peniques

Previous | Nbr. 9-1, October 2005 | Next