Benjamin J. Roscoe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee., 107 F.3d 21 (10th Cir. 1997)

Federal Circuits, 10th Cir. (February 04, 1997)

Docket number: 96-2138


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/benjamin-roscoe-plaintiff-america-defendant-36134297
Id. vLex: VLEX-36134297

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Hunter v. Beck (10th Cir. 2007)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Johnson v. Lynn Hickey Dodge Inc. (10th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Basham v. Uphoff (10th Cir. 1998)

Text:

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. Submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Benjamin Roscoe appeals from an order of the district court enjoining him from filing further lawsuits "against the United States, a federal agency, or any federal employee, in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico" without first seeking leave of court and certifying "that the claims he wishes to present are new claims never before raised and disposed of on the merits by any federal court" and that "the claims are not frivolous or taken in bad faith." Memorandum Opinion and Order, May 28, 1996, at 1,3,4. We have reviewed the district court order in light of our remand order filed April 25, 1996, and the requirements of Tripati v. Beaman, 878 F.2d 351 (10th Cir.1989), and we conclude the district court order fully complies with both.

We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court enjoining Mr. Roscoe. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access