Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Document language
Search in this document
Sponsored Ads:
Citations:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. -
S. H. Mcnutt, Jr., and Alice H. Mcnutt, D/B/a Partners Under the Firm Name of Nehi Bottling Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Cardox Corporation, Defendant-Appellee., 329 F.2d 107 (6th Cir. 1964)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Andrew W. Pettibone, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden of Oregon State Penitentiary, and James A. Redden, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondents-Appellees., 666 F.2d 333 (9th Cir. 1981)
Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden of Oregon State Penitentiary, and James A. Redden, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondents-Appellees.
Cited by:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. -
Kelley v. DuBoise (1st Cir. 1995)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Richard William Claxton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Department of Corrections; Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 995 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1993)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. -
Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Huey Lee Strader, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard Carlton, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 928 F.2d 405 (6th Cir. 1991)
Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Huey Lee Strader, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard Carlton, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. -
Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Louis Charles Sheptin, Doing Business as Roger Moody, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. Cotton, Defendant-Appellee., 928 F.2d 1133 (6th Cir. 1991)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Ervin Charles St. Amand, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George Kaiser, Dr., Medical Director of Nevada D.O.P. Medical Division, in His Individual and Personal Capacity, Defendant-Appellee., 995 F.2d 232 (9th Cir. 1993)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Ronald Williams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Los Angeles; Daryl F. Gates, Chief of Police; Robert Mcnamara; Connie L. Castruita, Defendants-Appellees. (Two Cases), 996 F.2d 1230 (9th Cir. 1993)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Jessie D. Clark, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Rowland, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 980 F.2d 736 (9th Cir. 1992)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Mark Koch, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James G. Ricketts, Defendant-Appellee., 68 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 1995)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Historical Research, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter William Cabral, Defendant-Appellant, v. the Renaissance Place, a California Proprietorship, Defendant. Historical Research, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter William Cabral, Defendant-Appellee, v. the Renaissance Place, a California Proprietorship, Defendant., 80 F.3d 377 (9th Cir. 1996)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. -
Tracy Ray Vaughan, Et Al., Plaintiffs, and Mark Koch, Donald Nelson, and Mark Osborne, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James Ricketts, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 950 F.2d 1464 (9th Cir. 1991)
Text:
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of oregon.
Before BROWNING, THOMPSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Appellant appeals from the district court order denying his motion for a default judgment. Because such a denial is not a final appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See McNutt v. Cardox Corp.,
329 F.2d 107 , 108 (6th Cir.1964).
Moreover, appellant did not file his notice of appeal within the 30-day time period required under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a). This time period is mandatory and jurisdictional. See Pettibone v. Cupp,
666 F.2d 333 , 334 (9th Cir.1981).
Accordingly, appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed.
Sponsored Ads:
Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Constitutions Forms and Contracts Legal Books and Journals Case Law News and Business Regulations U.S. Code
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
RSS