United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Donald Boldin, Lewis Crump, John Oscar Luck, Johnny Ray Moore, Jack W. Scarborough, Leonard Bonnell Steele, and Luis Rosendo Escobar, Defendants-Appellants., 779 F.2d 618 (11th Cir. 1986)

Federal Circuits, Eleventh Circuit (January 10, 1986)

Docket number: 84-8672


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/boldin-crump-luck-scarborough-bonnell-rosendo-37657481
Id. vLex: VLEX-37657481

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Binker, Defendant-Appellant., 799 F.2d 695 (11th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone Jones A/K/a Bernard Elder, and Ted Green A/K/a Be Bop, Defendants-Appellants., 918 F.2d 909 (11th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome Mcteer, Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos de La Fuente, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Dean Hall, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Carlos de La Fuente, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Cruz-Barrientos, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Carlos de La Fuente, Defendant-Appellant., 796 F.2d 1394 (11th Cir. 1986) Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome Mcteer, Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos de La Fuente, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Dean Hall, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Carlos de La Fuente, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Cruz-Barrientos, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Carlos de La Fuente, Defendant-Appellant.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando Fernandez, Rafael Enrique Franjul, A/K/a Frank Sinatra, Defendants- Appellants., 797 F.2d 943 (11th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garland Arnoldt, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garland Arnoldt, A/K/a Shagg, Defendant-Appellant., 947 F.2d 1120 (4th Cir. 1991)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - the Reverend Father John P. O'Malley, O.S.A., Individually, and James A. Nesbitt, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the Reverend Father Patrick H. O'Neill, O.S.A., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 887 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir. 1989)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garland Claude Cochran, Defendant-Appellant., 883 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir. 1989)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph Maza A/K/a Rafael Maza, Defendant-Appellee., 983 F.2d 1004 (11th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - United States of America, Appellee, v. Delores Bennett, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Noble Laverne Bennett, Also Known as Turtle, Also Known as Little Brother, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. George Dixon, Also Known as Willie Mack, Also Known as Dick, Also Known as Big Brother, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Darryl Gillespie, Also Known as Hawk, Also Known as Hawkeye, Appellant., 44 F.3d 1364 (8th Cir. 1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie Burnette Erwin, Maranetta Martin Smith, Tarenthia Esmarelda Erwin, Joe Neal, Jr., Glenda Rochelle Lawton, Robyn Anderson Norman, Jo Carol Erwin, Grace Helen Davis, Diana Carroll Berry, Tyrell Defaris Erwin, and Don Wayne Erwin, Defendants-Appellants., 793 F.2d 656 (5th Cir. 1986)

Text:

Alden W. Snead, Deacatur, Ga. (Court Appointed), for L. Crump.

E. Marcus Davis, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for J. Luck.

Craig A. Gillen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Steve R. Wisebram, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

John Oliver Ellis, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Atlanta, Ga., for J. Scarborough.

P. Bruce Kirwan, Atlanta, Ga., for B. Steele.

Gino P. Negretti, Miami, Fla., for L. Escobar.

Eric Welch, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for J. Moore.

Bobby D. Wilson, Atlanta, Ga., for C. Boldin.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Sept. 27, 1985, 11 Cir., 772 F.2d 719).

Before VANCE and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges and LYNNE*, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On petition for rehearing, we delete from our opinion reported at 772 F.2d 719, 727 (11th Cir.1985), those two paragraphs referenced and [5, 6] and insert the following:

Our application of the Blockburger/Albernaz test to the conspiracy counts in this case shows no double jeopardy violation. Proof sufficient to prove a violation of the RICO conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1962(d), requires that the government demonstrate (1) the existence of an agreement, (2) the existence of an enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce, (3) the defendant's association with the enterprise, (4) the defendant's participation in conducting the enterprise's affairs, and (5) that the defendant's participation was through a pattern of racketeering activity, indicated by the commission of at least two racketeering acts. United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 829 (5th Cir.1980).

Section 963 of Title 21, the conspiracy to import statute, requires proof of (1) the existence of an agreement (2) to import (3) a controlled substance (4) into the United States and (5) the defendant's knowing and voluntary participation in the agreement. United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1359-60 (11th Cir.), reh'g denied, 749 F.2d 733 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom. Hobson v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 3476, 87 L.Ed.2d 613, Villanueva v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 3477, 87 L.Ed.2d 613, Waldrop v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 3488, 87 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985).

Further, proof sufficient to prove a violation of section 846 of Title 21 requires that the government show (1) the existence of an agreement (2) to possess (3) with intent to distribute (4) a controlled substance and (5) the defendant's knowing and voluntary participation in the agreement. United States v. Cruz, 765 F.2d 1020, 1025 (11th Cir.1985).

The petition for rehearing is in all other respects DENIED.

* Honorable Seybourn H. Lynne, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access