Larry Booker, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee., 801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1986)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (September 26, 1986)

Docket number: 83-1136

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/booker-jabe-kinross-correctional-facility-37660739
Id. vLex: VLEX-37660739

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Larry Booker, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee., 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir. 1985)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Jimmy Royster, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Norris W. Mcmackin, Supt., Respondent-Appellee., 845 F.2d 327 (6th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Buckley Andre Bruner, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.P. Perini, Supt., Respondent-Appellee., 875 F.2d 531 (6th Cir. 1989)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. James Earle Mayes, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dewey Sowders, Warden; Attorney General of Kentucky, Respondents-Appellees., 880 F.2d 415 (6th Cir. 1989) Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. James Earle Mayes, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dewey Sowders, Warden; Attorney General of Kentucky, Respondents-Appellees.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Reginald Jones, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.O. Davis, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 835 F.2d 835 (11th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Rodriquez-Cardenas, Amado Jesus Perez, Defendants-Appellants., 866 F.2d 390 (11th Cir. 1989)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Michael Roman, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant. Harold Schreiber, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dominick R. Salamack, Superintendent of Edgecombe Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee., 822 F.2d 214 (2nd Cir. 1987) Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant. Harold Schreiber, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dominick R. Salamack, Superintendent of Edgecombe Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred M. Mosely, Defendant-Appellant., 810 F.2d 93 (6th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - James H. Bell, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dennis Baker, Respondent-Appellant., 954 F.2d 400 (6th Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ella Louise Forbes and Lillie Mae Berry, Defendants-Appellants., 816 F.2d 1006 (5th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Frank Teague, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael Lane, Director, Department of Corrections, and Michael O'Leary, Warden, Respondents-Appellees., 820 F.2d 832 (7th Cir. 1987)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Chari Grove argued, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Mich., Eric J. Eggan, Edgar L. Church, Jr. argued, Asst. Atty. Gen., Corrections Div., Lansing, Mich., for respondent-appellee.

Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court "for further consideration in light of Allen v. Hardy, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986) and Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)." Michigan v. Booker, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 3289, 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986). We have reviewed those decisions and have determined that they do not affect our disposition of Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir.1985).

We therefore reinstate our previous opinion and judgment.

* The Honorable Samuel H. Bell, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /