Federal Circuits, Fourth Circuit (February 09, 2007)
Docket number: 06-1448
Not Published
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/brien-v-gonzales-27670822
Id. vLex: VLEX-27670822
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1448MI CHOONG O'BRIEN, Petitioner, versusALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of ImmigrationAppeals. (A39-763-877)Submitted: January 22, 2007 Decided: February 9, 2007Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior CircuitJudge.Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Jim Tom Haynes, JIM TOM HAYNES, P.C., Washington, D.C., forPetitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, DonaldE. Keener, Bryan S. Beier, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mi Choong O'Brien, a native and citizen of Korea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying her motion to reopen her immigration proceedings as a matter of discretion. Based on our review of the record, we find that we lack jurisdiction to review O'Brien's claim that the Board should have exercised its sua sponte power to reopen her deportation proceedings. See Harchenko v. INS, 379 F.3d 405, 410-11 (6th Cir. 2004); Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 249-50 (5th Cir. 2004); Belay-Gebru v. INS, 327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir. 2003); Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 472, 474-75 (3d Cir. 2003); Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002); Luis v. INS, 196 F.3d 36, 40-41 (1st Cir. 1999). Because we lack jurisdiction over the petition, we decline to address the additional ground identified in the Board's decision denying O'Brien's motion to reopen. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSEDTry vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access