Federal Circuits, 11th Cir. (March 15, 1984)
Docket number: 83-8028
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/brooks-francis-diagnostic-classification-37646735
Id. vLex: VLEX-37646735
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - John Charles Lesko, Appellant, v. Joseph Lehman, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; Charles Zimmerman, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution At Graterford; Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution At Rockview; James J. Haggerty, General Counsel of Pennsylvania; and Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellees., 925 F.2d 1527 (3rd Cir. 1991) Appellant, v. Joseph Lehman, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; Charles Zimmerman, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution At Graterford; Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution At Rockview; James J. Haggerty, General Counsel of Pennsylvania; and Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellees.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Warren Mccleskey, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee., 753 F.2d 877 (11th Cir. 1985) Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.
Mary Beth Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, J. Robert Elliot, Judge.ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC(Opinion September 15, 1983, 11th Cir., 1983, 716 F.2d 780).Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.BY THE COURT:A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access