Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No. 175, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent., 294 F.2d 261 (D.C. Cir. 1961)

Federal Circuits, D.C. Cir. (July 06, 1961)

Docket number: 15957


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/chauffeurs-warehousemen-36684545
Id. vLex: VLEX-36684545

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Teamsters v. Morton, 377 U.S. 252 (1964)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Clifford W. Potter, Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Houston Gulf Coast Building Trades Council, Afl-Cio, Et Al., Respondents-Appellants., 482 F.2d 837 (5th Cir. 1973)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Carrier Corporation, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent., 311 F.2d 135 (2nd Cir. 1962)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - Limbach Company, v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Afl-Cio and Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 108, Appellants., 949 F.2d 1241 (3rd Cir. 1991)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - Limbach Company, Appellant in 90-3639, v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union No. 12, Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 17, Sheet, 949 F.2d 1211 (3rd Cir. 1991)

Text:

Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent.

Mr. Harry S. Littman, Washington, D.C., filed a brief on behalf of McJunkin Corp., as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, EDGERTON and WASHINGTON, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

In aid of a strike against McJunkin Corporation in Charleston, West Virginia, the union (1) picketed its plant, (2) told employees of neutral trucking concerns, over the telephone, that the plant was picketed, expressly or impliedly asking them to respect the picket line, and (3) at the premises of one neutral concern, Miami Transportation Company, induced its employees not to unload a McJunkin truck for transshipment. This last was a clear violation of 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. 158(b)(4) (A), but there was no evidence that any other action of the union had any illegal purpose or effect. The Board's order is apparently intended to prevent the union from inducing employees of any trucking concern to respect the picket line at McJunkin's plant. But peaceful primary picketing and its normal incidents, including requests to neutrals not to cross the picket line, cannot be forbidden though the union has acted illegally elsewhere. The case will be remanded to the Board with directions to modify its order so that it will not be broader than the one the Hearing Examiner had recommended. As so modified, the order will be enforced.

Order modified.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge (dissenting).

My view is that the Board's order should be enforced without modification.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access