Federal Circuits, Fifth Circuit (November 23, 1964)
Docket number: 20731
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/clarence-coil-elrod-addie-bud-williams-36708379
Id. vLex: VLEX-36708379
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver, 413 U.S. 189 (1973)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - the Board of Education of the Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent District No. 89, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, a Public Body Corporate, Jack F. Parker, Superintendent of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Public Schools, M. J. Burr, Assistant Superintendent of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Public Schools, Melvin P. Rogers, Phil C. Bennett, William F. Lott, Mrs. Warren F. Welch and Foster Estes, Members of the Board of Education of Oklahoma City Schools, Independent District No. 89, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, and Their Successors in Office, Appellants, v. Robert L. Dowell and Vivian C. Dowell, Infants, By A. L. Dowell, Their Father and Next Friend, Edwina Houston Helton, a Minor, By Her Mother, Gloria Burse, and Gary Russell, a Minor, By His Father, George Russell, Appellees., 375 F.2d 158 (10th Cir. 1967) Independent District No. 89, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, a Public Body Corporate, Jack F. Parker, Superintendent of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Public Schools, M. J. Burr, Assistant Superintendent of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Public Schools, Melvin P. Rogers, Phil C. Bennett, William F. Lott, Mrs. Warren F. Welch and Foster Estes, Members of the Board of Education of Oklahoma City Schools, Independent District No. 89, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, and Their Successors in Office, Appellants, v. Robert L. Dowell and Vivian C. Dowell, Infants, By A. L. Dowell, Their Father and Next Friend, Edwina Houston Helton, a Minor, By Her Mother, Gloria Burse, and Gary Russell, a Minor, By His Father, George Russell, Appellees.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Karl P. Offermann and Mary E. Offermann, Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of Children Eligible To Attend the Public Schools of the City of Buffalo, New York, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Earthly J. Gaskin, Geraldine Gaskin, Robert E. Jackson and Anna B. Jackson, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Anthony J. Nitkowski, as President and a Member of the Board of Education of the City of Buffalo, New York, Peter Gust Economou, Lydia T. Wright, Alfreda W. Slominski, Carmelo A. Parlato, Bernard S. Rosenblat and George F. Goodyear, as Members of the Board of Education of the City of Buffalo, New York, Joseph Manch, as Superintendent of Schools of the City of Buffalo, New York, James E. Allen, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, and the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Defendants-Appellees, Yerby Dixon, Newton Garber, Blanche Thomas, Erwin Johnson, Evelyn Perkins and Julia Johns, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees., 378 F.2d 22 (2nd Cir. 1967) Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of Children Eligible To Attend the Public Schools of the City of Buffalo, New York, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Earthly J. Gaskin, Geraldine Gaskin, Robert E. Jackson and Anna B. Jackson, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Anthony J. Nitkowski, as President and a Member of the Board of Education of the City of Buffalo, New York, Peter Gust Economou, Lydia T. Wright, Alfreda W. Slominski, Carmelo A. Parlato, Bernard S. Rosenblat and George F. Goodyear, as Members of the Board of Education of the City of Buffalo, New York, Joseph Manch, as Superintendent of Schools of the City of Buffalo, New York, James E. Allen, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, and the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Defendants-Appellees, Yerby Dixon, Newton Garber, Blanche Thomas, Erwin Johnson, Evelyn Perkins and Julia Johns, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees.
Robert B. Thompson, Gainesville, Ga., for appellants.
Gary B. Blasingame, Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., Floyd M. Buford, U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and WHITEHURST, District Judge.PER CURIAM.Appellants here challenge only the sufficiency of the evidence to justify submission of this liquor law violation case to the jury. Although the proof is circumstantial, we conclude that it was sufficient to permit the jury to find both appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.The judgments are affirmed.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access