Dunlap, v. Ellis., 207 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1953)
Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (November 24, 1953)
Docket number: 14595
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/dunlap-v-ellis-36645513
Id. vLex: VLEX-36645513
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Document language
Search in this document
Document options
RSSU.S. Supreme Court - McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 (1954)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Mamiye Bros., Et Al., Libellants-Appellants, v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., Et Al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co. Inc., Et Al., Impleaded-Respondents - Cross-Appellees. Gelmart Knitting Mills, Inc., Et Al., Libellants-Appellants, v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., Et Al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co. Inc., Et Al., Impleaded-Respondents - Cross-Appellees. Isaac Cohen & Sons Corp. Et Al., Libellants-Appellants, v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., Et Al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co., Inc., Et Al., Impleaded-Respondents - Cross-Appellees., 360 F.2d 774 (2nd Cir. 1966) Et Al., Libellants-Appellants, v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., Et Al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co. Inc., Et Al., Impleaded-Respondents - Cross-Appellees. Gelmart Knitting Mills, Inc., Et Al., Libellants-Appellants, v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., Et Al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co. Inc., Et Al., Impleaded-Respondents - Cross-Appellees. Isaac Cohen & Sons Corp. Et Al., Libellants-Appellants, v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., Et Al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co., Inc., Et Al., Impleaded-Respondents - Cross-Appellees.
Erwin K. Stork, Austin, Tex., for appellant.
Willis E. Gresham, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Tex., for appellee.Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.This is an attempt to appeal from an order refusing to issue the writ of habeas corpus as prayed for by a prisoner seeking release from State custody where he is held pursuant to State process. The district judge permitted the appeal in forma pauperis, but declined to issue a certificate of probable cause.Upon our examination of the record to determine whether such a certificate should be issued and the appeal allowed, we find that the contentions made are without merit. We, therefore, decline to issue a certificate of probable cause, and accordingly dismiss the appeal.Dismissed.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
- Constitutions
- Forms and Contracts
- Legal Books and Journals
- Case Law
- News and Business
- Regulations
- U.S. Code
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access
