29 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 841, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9260 Jesse Lincoln Woodard, Appellant, v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, W. Scott Street, Iii, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary and Treasurer of the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, J. Sloan Kuykendall, William H. King, John L. Walker, Carl C. Gillespie, Francis N. Crenshaw, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, Appellees., 598 F.2d 1345 (4th Cir. 1979)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (May 24, 1979)

Docket number: 78-1586


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/examiners-kuykendall-gillespie-crenshaw-36924470
Id. vLex: VLEX-36924470

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

US Code - Title 42: The Public Health and Welfare - 42 USC 1981 - Sec. 1981. Equal rights under the law

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Eugene W. Tyler, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Trammell E. Vickery Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. Ralph Banks, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Trammell E. Vickery Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. James E. C. Perry Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward S. Sell, Jr., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 517 F.2d 1089 (5th Cir. 1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - John Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. E. Pringle Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 550 F.2d 596 (10th Cir. 1976)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - David Richardson, Patricia King, Patrick Kelly and Hiram Spain, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. J. Means Mcfadden, Morris D. Rosen, C. W. F. Spencer, Robert D. Schumpert,David L. Freeman and Albert L. James, Jr., Individually and as Members of Thestate Board of Law Examiners, and Miss Frances Smith, Clerk of the Supremecourt of Southcarolina, Appellees. David Richardson, Patricia King, Patrick Kelly and Hiram Spain, on Behalf Ofthemselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Appellees, v. J. Means Mcfadden, Morris D. Rosen, C. W. F. Spencer, Robert D. Schumpert,David L. Freeman and Albert L. James, Jr., Individually and as Members of Thestate Board of Law Examiners, and Miss Frances Smith, Clerk of the Supremecourt of Southcarolina, Appellants., 563 F.2d 1130 (4th Cir. 1977) Patricia King, Patrick Kelly and Hiram Spain, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. J. Means Mcfadden, Morris D. Rosen, C. W. F. Spencer, Robert D. Schumpert,David L. Freeman and Albert L. James, Jr., Individually and as Members of Thestate Board of Law Examiners, and Miss Frances Smith, Clerk of the Supremecourt of Southcarolina, Appellees. David Richardson, Patricia King, Patrick Kelly and Hiram Spain, on Behalf Ofthemselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Appellees, v. J. Means Mcfadden, Morris D. Rosen, C. W. F. Spencer, Robert D. Schumpert,David L. Freeman and Albert L. James, Jr., Individually and as Members of Thestate Board of Law Examiners, and Miss Frances Smith, Clerk of the Supremecourt of Southcarolina, Appellants.

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James L. Martin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, John C. Eldridge, Harry A. Cole, Lawrence F. Rodowsky, John F. Mcauilffe, William H. Atkins, Ii, Albert T. Blackwell, Jr., Maryland State Board of Law Examiners, Charles H. Dorsey, Jr., William F. Abell, Jr., John F. Mudd, John W. Sause, Jr., Pamela J. White, Character Committee for the Third Judicial Circuit, Constance K. Putzel, John H. Zink, Iii, Rowland R. Bounds, T. Carroll Brown, E. Harrison Stone, Defendants-Appellees. James L. Martin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, Francis N. Crenshaw, John F. Kay, Jr., A. Hugo Blankenship, Jr., Robert E. Glenn, Stephen M. Quillen, National Conference of Bar Examiners, Defendants-Appellees., 870 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1989)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Lawrence Nestler and Marshall Allen Mason, Iii, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. the Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina and James B. Swails, Fred P. Parker, Iii, Horace E. Stacy, Jr., Robert C. Howison, Jr., W. H. Mcelwee, George H. Mcneill, Francis I. Parker, Eric C. Michaux, Charles G. Buck and William L. Mills, as Members of the Aforesaid Board of Law Examiners, Appellees., 611 F.2d 1380 (4th Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - 39 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 764, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,777 Sherman Haddock, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Board of Dental Examiners of California, Lawrence A. Puccinelli, David W. Hamrock, Edward J. Hoefling, Knud Flygenring, Takeyasu, J. Frisch, David Maudsley, Thomas M. Stewart, Helyn C. Luechauer, Marlene Schultz, Peter Young, Jr., Paul F. Senise, Kent Madsen, Adkins, Shirley J. Bailey, Defendants/Appellees., 777 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Edward A. Ganey; and Minor Son, Vance Alfred Ganey, Appellants, v. Napoleon B. Barefoot; and Charles E. Rice, Iii, Appellees., 749 F.2d 1124 (4th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Glenn F. Younger, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the Colorado State Board of Law Examiners, the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado, Honorable William H. Erickson, Honorable Luis D. Rovira, Honorable Paul v. Hodges, Honorable Robert B. Lee, Honorable Jean E. Dubofsky, Honorable George E. Lohr, Individually and as Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado, Defendants-Appellants., 625 F.2d 372 (10th Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - 29 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 837, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,968 George Ann Martin Held, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Gulf Oil Company, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee., 684 F.2d 427 (6th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Allene Fields and Earine Daniels, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hallsville Independent School District, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 906 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1990) Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hallsville Independent School District, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Robert E. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. American Postal Workers Union, National; American Postal Workers Union, Local Number 4755, Defendants-Appellees, and Patricia Fern Butts, Defendant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae., 192 F.3d 417 (4th Cir. 1999)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Monte J. Hukill, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Auto Care, Incorporated; Mcgillicuddy & Associates; William Mcgillicuddy, Defendants-Appellants., 192 F.3d 437 (4th Cir. 1999)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - the Association of Mexican-American Educators; California Association for Asian-Pacific Bilingual Education, on Behalf of Themselves, Their Members, and all Others Similarly Situated; Oakland Alliance of Black Educators, on Behalf of Themselves, Their Members, and all Others Similarly Situated; Sara Macneil Boyd; Sam Genis; Toua Yang; Bob Williams; Marta Leclaire; Antoinette Williams; Diana Kwan and Agnes Haynes, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. State of California; the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants., 195 F.3d 465 (9th Cir. 1999)

Text:

W. Edward Thompson, Washington, D. C. (James A. Winstead, Chesapeake, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Walter H. Ryland, Deputy Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va. (Marshall Coleman, Atty. Gen. of Virginia, Stuart H. Dunn, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Leonard L. Hopkins, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Before BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Woodard applied for admission to the Virginia Bar and sat for the bar examination. He failed to achieve a passing score on the examination and his application for admission to the bar was therefore denied. After filing discrimination charges with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and being issued a "Right to Sue" letter, he brought this suit as a class action in district court alleging violations of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e Et seq., and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1988 (1970). The district court denied class certification and dismissed the claims for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

The district court found and we agree that Title VII, by its own terms, does not apply to the bar examination. The Board of Bar Examiners is neither an "employer," an "employment agency," nor a "labor organization" within the meaning of the Act. Tyler v. Vickery (5th Cir. 1975) 517 F.2d 1089, 1096, Cert. denied 426 U.S. 940 , 96 S.Ct. 2660, 49 L.Ed.2d 393 (1976).

The district court properly dismissed the remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant must present his grievance to the Supreme Court of Virginia and, if it is decided adversely to him, may then petition the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari. Doe v. Pringle (10th Cir. 1976) 550 F.2d 596, 599, Cert. denied 431 U.S. 916 , 97 S.Ct. 2179, 53 L.Ed.2d 227 (1977).1

Finally, we see no error in the refusal of the district court to certify the action as a class action. Accordingly, for the reasons herein stated, and on the basis of the district court's opinions,2 the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

1 See Judge Hall's concurring opinion in Richardson v. McFadden (4th Cir. 1977) 563 F.2d 1130, 1132-33 (en banc)

2 Woodard v. Virginia Bd. of Bar Examiners (E.D.Va.1978) 454 F.Supp. 4; Woodard v. Virginia Bd. of Bar Examiners (E.D.Va.1976) 420 F.Supp. 211

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access