Notice: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(C) States that Unpublished Orders, Judgments, and Explanatory Memoranda May Not Be Cited as Precedents, But Counsel May Refer To Unpublished Dispositions When the Binding or Preclusive Effect of the Disposition, Rather Than Its Quality as Precedent, is Relevant. United States of America v. Lawrence A. Williams, Appellant., 948 F.2d 782 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Federal Circuits, D.C. Cir. (November 22, 1991)

Docket number: 90-3181

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/explanatory-memoranda-precedents-preclusive-37408028
Id. vLex: VLEX-37408028

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - United States of America v. Frederick v. Payne, Appellant., 805 F.2d 1062 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Text:

Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant's conviction be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence of appellant's March 6, 1990 arrest, his failure to comply with the requirements of his pre-trial release, or his failure to appear for his arraignment. See United States v. Payne, 805 F.2d 1062, 1066 (D.C.Cir.1986).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.