Federal Preemption

Robert A. Gorman - University of Virginia School of Law
Section: Chapter 8: State Law and Its Preemption
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/federal-preemption-41841483
Id. vLex: VLEX-41841483

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Supreme Court - Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)

U.S. Supreme Court - Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court - Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Andrew F. Ehat, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerald Tanner and Sandra Tanner, Dba Modern Microfilm Company, Defendants-Appellants., 780 F.2d 876 (10th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. and the Reader'S Digest Association, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Nation Enterprises and the Nation Associates, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees., 723 F.2d 195 (2nd Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Acorn Structures, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert F. Swantz, Defendant-Appellee, v. American Institute of Architects; National Society of Professional Engineers; Virginia Society of the Aia, Amici Curiae., 846 F.2d 923 (4th Cir. 1988)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Extract:

Federal Preemption

When relief is sought under state law against unauthorized use of literary, artistic or musical creations, a question arises as to the compatibility of state relief with the federal Copyright Act. For a state to forbid copying permitted under federal law, or for a state to permit copying that federal law proscribes, would equally raise questions of compliance with the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2.

In a number of significant cases that arose prior to the 1976 Copyright Act, the Supreme Court dealt with claims that state anti-copying laws were preempted because of their incompatibility with either the p...

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

days of Free Access

If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:

Other documents:

resolucion de 26 de junio de 2002 de la dirección general de seguros y fondos de pensiones... | Union Bank of California Foundation Announces $50,000 Grant to American Red Cross. | NOTIFICACIÓN de Propuestas de Resolución de expedientes que se relacionan en el Anexo ... | ANUNCIO de Graficas Duc, SCCL, sobre disolucion de la sociedad. | Finanças | decisao monocratica n 2006/0042274-4 of superior tribunal de justica - terceira turma, of june 04, 2007 | Case nº 3746 of Consiglio di Stato of July 21 2009 | Decisao Monocratica N 70015182082 of Tribunal de Justica do RS - Decima Terceira Camara Civel, of May 10, 2006 | decisao n 2000.51.01.031186-3 of tribunal regional federal da 2a regiao... | Acórdão Nº 70012657045 of Tribunal de Justiça do RS Décima Sexta Câmara Cível of October 05 2005 | Una mision especial | decisao monocratica n 2005/0185228-6 of superior tribunal de justica - sexta turma, of august 29, 2007 | arrete du 4 janvier 1996 portant nomination au cabinet du ministre

Federal Preemption

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Sponsored Ads:

Citations:

Extract:

Sponsored Ads:

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Legal Books and Journals