Frank Slavin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tim Curry, Etc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 583 F.2d 779 (5th Cir. 1978)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (November 06, 1978)

Docket number: 77-2922

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/frank-slavin-tim-curry-etc-defendants-36897242
Id. vLex: VLEX-36897242

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Michael Werle D/B/a Werle Consultants Family Mediation Center, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Rhode Island Bar Association, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees., 755 F.2d 195 (1st Cir. 1985)

U.S. Supreme Court - Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Lester Lee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph 'Scooter Joe' Willins, Kenneth Kaufman, 'John Bailey', 'John James', 'John Doe' and 'Richard Roe', Police Officers of the City of New York, Defendants, and Eugene Gold, District Attorney of the County of Kings, and Thomas Davenport, Assistant District Attorney of the County of Kings, Defendants-Appellants., 617 F.2d 320 (2nd Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - L. T. Bradt, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Shearn Smith Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-1461. Summary Calendar., 634 F.2d 796 (5th Cir. 1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - George M. Bishop, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Bar of Texas, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-2440. Summary Calendar., 791 F.2d 435 (5th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Harold T. Tarter Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James Hury Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 646 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Everett L. Almon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas Harold Sandlin, H. F. Sandlin, and Carl D. Nesmith, Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-1256. Summary Calendar. [Fn*], 603 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1979)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - C. R. 'Jake' Cook, T. W. Cook and Lee Deforke, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the Houston Post, Ralph Williams, Joseph Perino, Marvin Kent and Terry Collins, Defendants-Appellees., 616 F.2d 791 (5th Cir. 1980)

U.S. Supreme Court - Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Frank Slavin, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tim Curry, District Attorney, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 82-1094. Summary Calendar., 690 F.2d 446 (5th Cir. 1982)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Frank Slavin, pro se.

Marvin Collins, Asst. Dist. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for Curry, Walls, Robinson, Shannon, Lindsey, Starr, Chaney.

Doug Crouch, Fort Worth, Tex., for Pringle.

Roswald E. Shrull, Fort Worth, Tex., for Kohl.

Gordon H. Rowe, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Lon Evans.

Davis Grant, Gen. Counsel, Wayne Paris, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

James D. Whisenand, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., amicus curiae for Justices, Florida Supreme Court.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

On Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc

(Opinion 5th Cir., 1978, 574 F.2d 1256).

Before MORGAN, CLARK and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

At the direction of the court, counsel for defendant, Judge Charles Lindsey, has supplied the court with documentary evidence which establishes the following facts. Following the action of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals which vacated Frank Slavin's original conviction, he was on May 12, 1977 reindicted for the same offense with two prior felonies alleged for enhancement. On October 4, 1977 Slavin, represented by new counsel, waived a trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before Judge Lindsey who on that same date sentenced Slavin to a term of imprisonment of not less than two nor more than four years in the Texas Department of Corrections.

Based upon these newly demonstrated facts the court withdraws as moot the paragraphs of its opinion which appear immediately following headnotes (18) and (19), 574 F.2d at 1264. Except as modified herein the remainder of the petition for rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.