Halkias vs. General Dynamics (5th Cir. 1996)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (November 05, 1996)

Docket number: 95-11065

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/halkias-vs-general-dynamics-19999692
Id. vLex: VLEX-19999692

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Alvin Staudt, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glastron, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 92 F.3d 312 (5th Cir. 1996)

US Code - Title 29: Labor - 29 USC 2101 - Sec. 2101. Definitions; exclusions from definition of loss of employment

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11065

JOHN HALKIAS, ET AL.,

Plaintiff,

JOHN HALKIAS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

JAMES ANTHONY CUREINGTON,

Plaintiff,

versus

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

( 92-CV-860

October 22, 1996

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* For this action under the WARN ACT, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq., General Dynamics appeals the denial of its FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) motion, claiming that this action is time-barred. We affirm. See Staudt v. Glastron, 92 F.3d 312 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.