* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50880 Summary Calendar RIAD E. HAMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus H E B FOOD STORES, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-649 August 1, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Riad E. Hamad, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis , appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of H.E.B. Food Stores ("HEB"), dismissing Hamad's claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et se q. , and the Age discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. . Hamad contends that HEB failed to promote him to its store management and distribution management trainee programs because of Hamad's race, national origin, and age. Hamad also contends that HEB terminated him prematurely in retaliation for his intention to complain about the discriminatory treatment.

After conducting a de novo review of the record and the parties' briefs, we perceive no reversible error in the dis trict court's decision. See Bodenheimer v. PPG Indus. , 5 F.3d 955, 956 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. H amad v. H E B Food Stores , No. A-94-CV-649 (W.D. Tex.

Nov. 7, 1995).

A F F I R M E D.