Harassment and Discrimination Prevention Training: What the Law Requires

Labor Law Journal - Vol. 55 Nbr. 2, July 2004

Johnson, Michael W
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/harassment-prevention-training-requires-62051199
Id. vLex: VLEX-62051199

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Previous | Vol. 55 Nbr. 2, July 2004

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

For years, many employers have periodically trained their employees on how to prevent sexual harassment and other forms of workplace discrimination. Employers viewed the training as beneficial to promote a positive workplace, but did not necessarily view the training as an absolute requirement. However, since the US Supreme Court issued three landmark rulings in 1998 and 1999, harassment and discrimination prevention training is no longer a luxury. This article examines how employers who fail to provide harassment and discrimination prevention training may: 1. expose themselves to punitive damages, 2. lose their ability to raise a defense to harassment lawsuits, 3. contradict federal guidelines established by the EEOC, and 4. contradict state laws and guidelines. The return on investment of providing harassment and discrimination prevention training is examined. Legal issues related to the content and delivery of harassment and discrimination prevention training are addressed.

Headnotes:

Extract:

Harassment and Discrimination Prevention Training: What the Law Requires

[Leaving employees] in ignorance of the basic features of the discrimination laws is an extraordinary mistake for a company to make, and such an extraordinary mistake amounts to reckless indifference.1

For years, many employers have periodically trained their employees on how to prevent sexual harassment and other forms of workplace discrimination. Employers viewed the training as beneficial to promote a positive workplace, but did not necessarily view the training as an absolute requirement. However, since the U.S. Supreme Court issued three landmark rulings in 1998 and 1999, harassment and discrimination prevention training is no longer a luxury. Instead, the Supreme Court, lower federal and state courts, and federal and state guidelines have made it clear that employers should periodically provide this training to each employee.

Part I of this article examines how employers who fail to provide harassment and discrimination prevention training may:

* Expose themselves to punitive damages.

* Lose their ability to raise a defense to harassment lawsuits.

Contradict federal guidelines established by the EEOC.

* Contradict state laws and guidelines.

Part II examines the return on investment of providing harassment and discrimination prevention training. As discussed in further detail in this section, the number of harassment and discrimination cases filed per year between 1990 and 2000 tripled. At the same time, the cost of resolving a single claim-which includes verdict or settlement costs, attorneys' fees, and the cost of employee time responding to the claim-routinely costs an employer hundreds of thousands of dollars. Given that research indicates that effective harassment and discrimination prevention training greatly reduces the number of internal complaints and ext...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
negociado: 1 número de identificación unico: 07040 1 0011848/2006 procedimiento: procedimiento ordinario 628/2006 sobre pr... | Servicio Canario de la Salud. Servicio de Tesoreria y Recaudacion.- Edicto de 22 de octubre de 2003, relati... | downturn bites harder | Jospin iniciará en febrero su carrera hacia las presidenciales | acórdão nº 70028025518 of tribunal de justiça do rs - décima câmara cível, of march 26, 2009 | Acórdão Nº 71001947134 of Turmas Recursais - Primeira Turma Recursal Cível, of May 14, 2009 | Acórdão Nº 70006654461 of Tribunal de Justiça do RS - Vigésima Primeira Câmara Cível, of December 23, 2003 | Édito n.º 315/2008, de 02 de Julho de 2008 | Arrete du 8 janvier 2004 portant delegation de signature

Previous | Vol. 55 Nbr. 2, July 2004