Harold Lewis Peek, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America Et Al., Respondents-Appellees., 438 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1971)

Federal Circuits, 9th Cir. (April 16, 1971)

Docket number: 25044

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/harold-lewis-peek-petitioner-respondents-36748189
Id. vLex: VLEX-36748189

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

US Code - Title 28: Judiciary and Judicial Procedure - 28 USC 2255 - Sec. 2255. Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence

U.S. Supreme Court - Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 (1963)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Frank Gomez, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee., 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Text:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Southern Division; George H. Boldt, Judge.

Harold Lewis Peek, in pro. per.

Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellees.

Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON*, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The district court dismissed petitioner's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.

Affirmed.

Notes:

* Honorable Harry Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation