James Clay Martin, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 447 F.2d 985 (5th Cir. 1971)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (September 03, 1971)

Docket number: 71-1935


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/james-clay-martin-petitioner-respondent-36752604
Id. vLex: VLEX-36752604

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Johnnie Lintond Tillis, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 449 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1971)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - James Clay Martin, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 462 F.2d 60 (5th Cir. 1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Richard Montgomery, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 469 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Otis Ray Fitzgerald, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. Estelle, Director Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee., 505 F.2d 1334 (5th Cir. 1975)

Text:

James C. Martin, Jr., pro se.

Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the motion of a federal prisoner to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255.1

The court denied appellant's motions for a trial transcript and for § 2255 relief. There was a contested issue of fact as to whether law enforcement officers who appeared in a lineup with appellant, in which lineup appellant was identified by a witness, were known to the witness to be law enforcement officers and thus not persons suspected of the crime involved, with the result that the lineup was tainted. The trial court decided this contested issue on the basis of affidavits, which it may not do. Pike v. United States, 409 F.2d 499, 501 (5th Cir. 1969); Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487 , 494, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, 478 (1963).

Vacated and remanded.

Notes:

1 It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access