Jenaro Soto Medina, Appellee, v. People of the State of California and Peter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Appellants., 429 F.2d 1392 (9th Cir. 1970)

Federal Circuits, Ninth Circuit (August 18, 1970)

Docket number: 25776


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/jenaro-soto-medina-pitchess-angeles-36744344
Id. vLex: VLEX-36744344

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Juan Carlos Zuniga, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee., 988 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Yohey v. Collins (5th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Leslie Wayne Yohey, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James A. Collins, Director Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-5596. Summary Calendar., 985 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1993)

Text:

Donald J. Kaplan (argued) Deputy Dist. Atty., Evelle J. Younger, Dist. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Howard E. Beckler (argued) Hollywood, Cal., for real party in interest.

Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The State of California appeals from an order of the United States District Court granting appellee Medina's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted by the District Court on the ground that Medina's bail, pending trial, had been unconstitutionally revoked in a case in which he was charged with a felony in the California Superior Court. We stayed the District Court's order pending disposition of the appeal. After the filing of this appeal, Medina was tried and convicted in the state court. Thus this cause is now moot.

The order of the District Court is vacated, and that court is directed to dismiss the proceeding as moot.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access