United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. Thomas and Jon-T Farms, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. Thomas, A/K/a J. H. Thomas, Defendant-Appellant., 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (November 14, 1979)

Docket number: 78-5249,78-5374

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/john-thomas-jon-farms-36933757
Id. vLex: VLEX-36933757

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. Thomas and Jon-T Farms, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. Thomas, Also Known as J. H. Thomas, Defendant-Appellant., 617 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Larry Shelton Hentz, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward Hargett, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee., 71 F.3d 1169 (5th Cir. 1996)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. Thomas, Et Al., Defendants, Lonnie D. Clark and John H. Thomas, Defendants-Appellants., 709 F.2d 968 (5th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leonor Reyes Mauricio, Defendant-Appellee. No. 81-1564 Summary Calendar., 685 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - in Re the Special February, 1975 Grand Jury. in Re the Special April, 1977 Grand Jury. Appeal of James E. Baggot., 662 F.2d 1232 (7th Cir. 1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Keith A. Brink, Appellant., 648 F.2d 1140 (8th Cir. 1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon-T Chemicals, Inc., and Lewis M. Overton, Jr., Receiver for Jon-T Chemicals, Inc., Defendants-Appellants., 768 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants- Appellants., 806 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamiel Alexander Chagra, Defendant-Appellant., 669 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Steven Phillips and Richard Elliott Grant, Jr., Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Jay Meinster, A/K/a 'Robby', Eugene Arter Myers, A/K/a 'Big Gene', Richard Elliott Grant, Jr., Randall Gene Fisher, Modesto Echezarreta-Cruz, Robert Elliot Platshorn, A/K/a 'Roger Culpepper', Defendants-Appellants., 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Halbert O. Woodward, Chief Judge.

Travis D. Shelton, Lubbock, Tex., Michael E. Tigar, John J. Privitera, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants.

Bob D. Slough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lubbock, Tex., for the U. S.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion April 19, 1979, 5 Cir. 1979, 593 F.2d 615).

Before GEE and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER,** District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On rehearing, among other contentions, appellants press upon us the existence of possible collateral consequences deriving from the conversion counts, urging that these render inappropriate our disposition of those counts under the concurrent sentence doctrine. Assuming without deciding the presence of such consequences, we have reviewed appellants challenges to the convictions on the conversion counts and find them without merit except as to Count 92, the Blackstock count. As to that count, we conclude that the evidence does not support the conviction. To this extent, we therefore grant rehearing and reverse the conviction on Count 92.

The same considerations require that the cause be remanded as to the conversion counts for consideration by the court below of whether the addition of these counts, or any of them, was motivated by actual prosecutorial vindictiveness. To this extent as well rehearing is granted. In all other respects, it is denied.

No member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART IN NO. 78-5249.

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS

** District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /