Federal Circuits, 2nd Cir. (December 07, 1955)
Docket number: 118
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/keith-w-forster-oro-navigation-company-37620729
Id. vLex: VLEX-37620729
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - American Foreign S. S. Co. v. Matise, 423 U.S. 150 (1975)
U.S. Supreme Court - Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. 564 (1982)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Doyle v. Huntress, Inc. (1st Cir. 2005)
Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City (Joseph M. Cunningham, Vernon S. Jones and Walter X. Connor, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.
Dunn & Zuckerman, New York City (Morton Zuckerman and Mortimer E. Greif, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.We agree with what Judge Bondy said in his opinion, reported in 128 F.Supp. 113. We add the following as to one of appellant's contentions which Judge Bondy did not consider.46 U.S.C.A. § 596 imposes the duty of payment on "the master or owner". We think that, if the master fails to pay without sufficient cause, his neglect becomes also that of the owner, so that either is liable.1 The statute, designed to protect seamen, must be liberally interpreted for their benefit.2 Accordingly, Compagnie General Transatlantique v. Elting, 298 U.S. 217, 56 S.Ct. 770, 80 L.Ed. 1151, interpreting a statute, 8 U.S.C. § 167(a), with quite a different purpose, is inapposite.Affirmed. Notes: 1 Cf. Shilman v. United States, 2 Cir.,Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access