Khaldoon Nasan Saadi, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 912 F.2d 428 (10th Cir. 1990)

Federal Circuits, 10th Cir. (August 27, 1990)

Docket number: 89-9554


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/khaldoon-nasan-saadi-naturalization-37326762
Id. vLex: VLEX-37326762

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Nyenye v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (10th Cir. 1999)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Carlos Camacho-Bordes, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 33 F.3d 26 (8th Cir. 1994)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Tsegaw Belay-Gebru, Petitioner, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondent., 327 F.3d 998 (10th Cir. 2003)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Muhammad Younus, Petitioner, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondent., 968 F.2d 22 (10th Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Nasredin Joehar, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 957 F.2d 887 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5424, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9252 Saeed Foroughi, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 60 F.3d 570 (9th Cir. 1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - Gustavo Marrero, Petitioner, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondent., 990 F.2d 772 (3rd Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Yoram Bar-Levy, Petitioner, v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 990 F.2d 33 (2nd Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Lauriberto Ignacio, Petitioner, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondent., 955 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Orlando Roldan, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James Racette, Superintendent, Adirondack Correctional Facility, and U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondents-Appellees., 984 F.2d 85 (2nd Cir. 1993)

Text:

Khaldoon Nasan Saadi, pro se.

Lauri S. Filppu, Francesco Isgro, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before ANDERSON, BALDOCK and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent INS moves to dismiss this cause as jurisdictionally deficient. Fed. R. App. P. 27; 10th Cir. R. 10.2.8 & 27.2.1. Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board). The Board dismissed petitioner's appeal from a decision of the immigration judge finding petitioner deportable under Sec. 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. Sec . 1251(a)(2), and ineligible for relief from deportation.

Jurisdiction to review a final order of deportation by the Board arises under Sec. 106(a) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec . 1105a(a) and 28 U.S.C. ch. 158 pertaining to review of orders of federal agencies. Michelson v. INS, 897 F.2d 465, 467 (10th Cir.1990). However, Sec. 106(c) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec . 1105a(c), provides in part:

An order of deportation or of exclusion shall not be reviewed by any court if the alien has not exhausted the administrative remedies available to him as of right under the immigration laws and regulations or if he has departed from the United States after the issuance of the order.

(emphasis added). The INS contends that petitioner's deportation eliminates our jurisdiction to review his deportation order. We agree.

"The statute's command is unequivocal[:]" once petitioner departed the United States via deportation, a deportation order may not be reviewed by "any court." Umanzor v. Lambert, 782 F.2d 1299, 1303 (5th Cir.1986); see also Quezada v. INS, 898 F.2d 474, 476-77 (5th Cir.1990); Asai v. Castillo, 593 F.2d 1222, 1223-24 (D.C.Cir.1979). The right to obtain judicial review of a final deportation order does not require the INS to defer deportation; a stay must be obtained. 8 U.S.C. Sec . 1105a(a)(7); Umanzor, 782 F.2d at 1303.

The record establishes that no stay was obtained and petitioner has been deported. Thus, we are without jurisdiction to review this deportation order. See Quezada, 898 F.2d at 477.

PETITION DISMISSED.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access