Law v. Lake Metroparks , Slip Opinion No. 2007-Ohio-6749

Ohio Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Ohio (December 20, 2007)

Docket number: 2007-0298
2007-Ohio-6749

Per Curiam - 2007-Ohio-6749
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/law-v-lake-metroparks-slip-opinion-34791910
Id. vLex: VLEX-34791910

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Adverse possession — Real property owned by a park district — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.

Text:

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Law v. Lake Metroparks, Slip Opinion No. 2007-Ohio-6749.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2007-OHIO-6749 LAW ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAKE METROPARKS, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Law v. Lake Metroparks, Slip Opinion No. 2007-Ohio-6749.] Adverse possession -- Real property owned by a park district -- Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.

(No. 2007-0298 -- Submitted November 28, 2007 -- Decided December 20, 2007.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 2006-L-072, 2006-Ohio-7010.

____________________

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist., 116 Ohio St.3d 148, 2007-Ohio-5586.

MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

- 1 -

PFEIFER, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.

O'DONNELL, J., not participating.

____________________

Redmond, Walker & Murray and Gerald R. Walker, for appellants.

Gibson, Brelo, Ziccarelli & Martello and Joseph Gibson, for appellee.

____________________

- 2 -

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



Other documents:
Southwest Idaho& Darkwood Consort& Serious Music with a Playful Heart | Read Isle Pages | DreamVision Studios to Make Las Vegas Home of New ``Ambassador of Romance'' International Television S... | Acordao N 70025694183 of Tribunal de Justica do RS Decima Segunda Camara Civel of December 18 2008 | 3 mai 1999 - arrete royal portant modification a l arrete royal du 6 decembre 1994 determinant les regles suivan... | Extracto de Despacho N.º 1460/2008 de 5 de Dezembro | Acuerdo Nº 8293525900 of 6ª Câmara de Direito Público, of February 09, 2009 | Natural gas exportation and importation Rumford Power Associates Limited Partnership, | Satna Stone & Lime Co. Ltd., M.P. Etc. VS. Union Of India & Another Etc | acordao n 1.0024.04.338303-3/001(1) of tjmg. tribunal de justica do estado de minas gerais, of september 19, 2007 | Arrêt - Cour de cassation - Chambre Criminelle Nº 91-84405, October 15, 1991 | Decisão Monocrática Nº 70027975366 of Tribunal de Justiça do RS Vigési...