Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (November 28, 1950)
Docket number: 13295
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/lewis-v-times-pub-co-36635776
Id. vLex: VLEX-36635776
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U.S. 249 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court - Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575 (1978)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco; W. W. Mcallister and William K. Divers, as Members of the Home Loan Bank Board; A. v. Ammann; George K. Bramley; and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, a Federal Corporation, Petitioners, v. Honorable Peirson M. Hall, Judge of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California; the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Mallonee, Bucklin, and Fergus, Acting as the Shareholders Protective Committee of Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association; Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association; Title Service Company; Robert H. Wallis; First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Wilmington; Home Investment Co.; George Turner; First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Bellflower and John D. Willhoit, Respondents., 225 F.2d 349 (9th Cir. 1955) as Members of the Home Loan Bank Board; A. v. Ammann; George K. Bramley; and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, a Federal Corporation, Petitioners, v. Honorable Peirson M. Hall, Judge of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California; the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Mallonee, Bucklin, and Fergus, Acting as the Shareholders Protective Committee of Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association; Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association; Title Service Company; Robert H. Wallis; First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Wilmington; Home Investment Co.; George Turner; First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Bellflower and John D. Willhoit, Respondents.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,548 Washington Public Utilities Group, Et Al., Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Respondent, Henry Puchall; Joseph Harris; David Gold; Marvin Frankel; Chemical Bank, Et Al., Real Parties in Interest. Salomon Brothers, Inc., and Columbia Rural Electric Association, Inc., Et Al., Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Respondent, Washington Public Utilities Group, Et Al., Real Parties in Interest., 843 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1988) 548 Washington Public Utilities Group, Et Al., Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Respondent, Henry Puchall; Joseph Harris; David Gold; Marvin Frankel; Chemical Bank, Et Al., Real Parties in Interest. Salomon Brothers, Inc., and Columbia Rural Electric Association, Inc., Et Al., Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Respondent, Washington Public Utilities Group, Et Al., Real Parties in Interest.
Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
Leslie HUmphrey, C.C. McDonald, Wichita Falls, Tex., for appellee.Before HUTCHENSON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.Brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, the suit was for a money demand, overtime compensation, and liquidated damages.Plaintiff's request for a jury denied, the cause went to trial before the district judge without a jury and judgment was rendered for the defendant.Appellant, plaintiff below, is here assigning error on the refusal of his jury request and on the failure to render judgment for him.Appellee urges upon us that the case was not one requiring a jury, and it was not error to refuse the request. He urges further that there was no substantial evidence upon which a jury might properly have returned a verdict for plaintiff, and, if the refusal was error, it was harmless. Burke Grain Co. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., 8 Cir.,Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access