Little Rock School District, Appellee, Lorene Joshua, As Next Friend of Minors Leslie Joshua, Stacy Joshua and Wayne Joshua; Rev. Robert Willingham, As Next Friend of Minor Tonya Willingham; Sara Matthews As Next Friend of Khayyam Davis, Alexa Armstrong and Karlos Armstrong; Mrs. Alvin Hudson As Next Friend of Tatia Hudson; Mrs. Hilton Taylor As Next Friend of Parsha Taylor, Hilton Taylor, Jr. and Brian Taylor; Rev. John M. Miles As Next Friend of Janice Miles and Derrick Miles; Rev. Robert Willingham on Behalf of and As President of the Little Rock Branch of the Naacp; Lorene Joshua on Behalf of and As President of the No. Little Rock Branch of the Naacp, Appellants, Katherine Knight, Individually and As President of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association (Lrcta); Lrcta; Ed Bullington, Individually and As President of the Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (Pact); Pact; John Harrison, Individually and As President of the North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association (Nlrcta); Nlrcta; ..., 865 F.2d 164 (8th Cir. 1988)

Federal Circuits, 8th Cir. (December 12, 1988)

Docket number: 87-1404,87-1537,87-1750,87-1751,87-1805,87-1806,87-1837,87-1921,87-2071,87-2371,87-2150


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/lrcta-pact-nlrcta-38429492
Id. vLex: VLEX-38429492

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Oscar E. Kramer, Jr., Appellant, v. Mike Kemna, Appellees., 21 F.3d 305 (8th Cir. 1994)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - United States of America v. Keith S. Carswell, Appellant., 922 F.2d 876 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Robert L. Fox, Appellant, v. Todd Allen Dannenberg, Appellee., 906 F.2d 1253 (8th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - Waldorf v. Shuta (3rd Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - Mark Waldorf, Appellant in No. 97-5195, v. Edward J. Shuta; Carolyn Wood; Kenneth C. Spence, Jr.; Mary Kay Spence; Borough of Kenilworth; Joseph Rego; Henry J. Moll; Victor Smith; Lawrence Stickle; Charles David; Joseph Ventre; Thomas Neville; William J. Ahern; William E. Conrad; Livio Mancino; Gary Rowinsky; Mario Dibella; Vincent Scorese; Harry Grapenthin; Mary Kelly; Richard Mccormack; William Holt; A. Zeleniak; Richard Lomax; C. William Gutekunst; Frederick Bailey; Michael Padula; Charles Scheuermann; Fred Sues; Joseph Walyuf; Thomas Mchale; Philip Ernst; Frank J. Mascaro; Walter E. Boright, Jr.; Albert Simmenroth; James E. O'Brien; Frank J. Johdof; Raymond Blydenburgh; Edward Kasbarian; John J. O'Lock; Edmac Enterprises; Edward Mcdermott. Mark Waldorf v. Edward J. Shuta; Carolyn Wood; Kenneth C. Spence, Jr.; Mary Kay Spence; Borough of Kenilworth; Joseph Rego; Henry J. Moll; Victor Smith; Lawrence Stickle; Charles David; Joseph Ventre; Thomas Neville; ..., 142 F.3d 601 (3rd Cir. 1998) Appellant in No. 97-5195, v. Edward J. Shuta; Carolyn Wood; Kenneth C. Spence, Jr.; Mary Kay Spence; Borough of Kenilworth; Joseph Rego; Henry J. Moll; Victor Smith; Lawrence Stickle; Charles David; Joseph Ventre; Thomas Neville; William J. Ahern; William E. Conrad; Livio Mancino; Gary Rowinsky; Mario Dibella; Vincent Scorese; Harry Grapenthin; Mary Kelly; Richard Mccormack; William Holt; A. Zeleniak; Richard Lomax; C. William Gutekunst; Frederick Bailey; Michael Padula; Charles Scheuermann; Fred Sues; Joseph Walyuf; Thomas Mchale; Philip Ernst; Frank J. Mascaro; Walter E. Boright, Jr.; Albert Simmenroth; James E. O'Brien; Frank J. Johdof; Raymond Blydenburgh; Edward Kasbarian; John J. O'Lock; Edmac Enterprises; Edward Mcdermott. Mark Waldorf v. Edward J. Shuta; Carolyn Wood; Kenneth C. Spence, Jr.; Mary Kay Spence; Borough of Kenilworth; Joseph Rego; Henry J. Moll; Victor Smith; Lawrence Stickle; Charles David; Joseph Ventre; Thomas Neville; ...

Text:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Henry Woods, Judge.

JUDGMENT

This appeal from the United States District Court was submitted on the record of the district court, briefs of the parties and was argued by counsel.

On the Court's own motion this appeal is hereby dismissed as moot, all issues having been resolved in companion consolidated appeals - 87-1404, et al. Mandate Forthwith.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access