Mahendra Rudra Sharma, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alexander Stevas, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court, Defendant-Appellee., 790 F.2d 1486 (9th Cir. 1986)

Federal Circuits, 9th Cir. (June 09, 1986)

Docket number: 85-2296


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/mahendra-rudra-sharma-stevas-clerk-37106450
Id. vLex: VLEX-37106450

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Alvin Stjernholm; Elsie Stjernholm, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara Peterson, Dorothy Ban, Debbie J. Brown, Individually and in Their Official Capacities; Cecil Clark; Bill Clark; Bill Smith; Clark A. Smith; Paul Smith; Ann D. Smith; Clark and Ann Smith Estate and Auction Company, Defendants-Appellees., 83 F.3d 347 (10th Cir. 1996)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Sheila Wainscott, Et Al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 5 F.3d 544 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Don Laflamme, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James H. Gomez; Et Al., Defendant-Appellee., 5 F.3d 537 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. William E. Butler, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theo White, Warden, Defendant-Appellee., 972 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Daniel C. Ott, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States Parole Commission, Respondent-Appellee., 805 F.2d 1035 (6th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Loren R. Lusero, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden, Defendant-Appellee., 999 F.2d 543 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Heulon L. Perrin, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Trw Information Services, Defendant-Appellee., 990 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Harry Beale, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, John P. Hehman, Clerk, Office of the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for 6Th Circuit; Supreme Court of the United States; Federal Judicial Center; and Administrative Office of United States Courts, Defendants-Appellees., 853 F.2d 926 (6th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Raymond A. Chamberlin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. California Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 967 F.2d 584 (9th Cir. 1992)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - David Glen Meyers, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Contra Costa County Department of Social Services, Et Al., Defendants- Appellees., 812 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1987)

Text:

Mahendra Rudra Sharma, in pro. per.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.

Before WALLACE, HUG, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court dismissing Sharma's Federal Tort Claims Act action with prejudice is affirmed. The defendant Clerk of the United States Supreme Court has absolute quasi-judicial immunity because his challenged activities were an integral part of the judicial process. Morrison v. Jones, 607 F.2d 1269, 1273 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 962 , 100 S.Ct. 1648, 64 L.Ed.2d 237 (1980).

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 3(f)

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access