Federal Circuits, 2nd Cir. (June 05, 2006)
Docket number: 01-4119
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/maidal-vs-ins-summ-ord-20635119
Id. vLex: VLEX-20635119
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

BIA
Ro cc o, IJ A71-967-534 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 5th day of June, two thousand and six. PRESENT: HON. JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge, HON. JON O. NEWMAN, HON. ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges. Yassin Hassan Maidal,* Petitioner, -v.- No. 01-4119-ag NAC United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent. FOR PETITIONER: Frederick P. Korkosz and Alyssa Gunther, Law Offices of Alice K. Berke, Albany, New York. FOR RESPONDENT: Glenn T. Suddaby, United States Attorney, Northern District of New York, Carl J. Boykin, Assistant United States Attorney, Syracuse, New York. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA's order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this decision. Petitioner Yassin Hassan Maidal petitions for review of an order of the BIA affirming Immigration Judge ("IJ") Michaelangelo Rocco's decision ordering Maidal's removal to Ethiopia and denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We assume the parties' familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. When the BIA agrees with the IJ's conclusion and, without rejecting any of the IJ's grounds for decision, emphasizes particular aspects of that decision, this Court reviews both the BIA's and IJ's opinions § 1252(b)(4)(B); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir. 2004). An agency determination "based on flawed reasoning . . . will not satisfy the substantial evidence standard," and the agency's use of "an inappropriately stringent standard when evaluating an applicant's testimony constitutes legal, not factual, error." Secaida-Rosales, 331 F.3d at 307; accord Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 400 (2d Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). The IJ and the BIA erroneously reasoned that, because Maidal was not directly victimized by Ethiopian government officials, he did not have a well-founded fear of future persecution. In their analysis of Maidal's fear of persecution, the IJ and the BIA failed to take into account the possibility that the government would impute to him a political opinion based on his brothers' leadership in the Western Somali Liberation Front. They also failed to take into account the warnings of Maidal's neighbors, after Maidal's father had been killed, that Maidal should escape since the soldiers were looking for the rest of the family. Chun Gao v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2005). Since the case must be remanded, we suggest that on remand, the BIA and the IJ might wish to consider the materials in the record that appear to conflict with some of the statements made in the State Department profile. Consequently, Maidal's petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA's order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this decision. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1). FOR THE COURT: Roseann B. MacKechnie, Clerk By: * The official caption is hereby amended to reflect the correct spelling of petitioner's name, as per p e t i t i o n e r ' s A u g u s t 6, 20 0 1 , letter.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access