Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joan E. Marcott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bureau of Prisons; United States Parole Commission; Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp; Donald Crump, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees., 91 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1996)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (July 31, 1996)

Docket number: 96-6280


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/marcott-vic-loy-alderson-camp-crump-18214245
Id. vLex: VLEX-18214245

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Harding v. Kellam (4th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Federal Express Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellant., 151 F.3d 536 (6th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - James Dwight Thomas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James Crosby, Secretary for the Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee., 371 F.3d 782 (11th Cir. 2004)

Text:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-94-271-1)

Joan E. Marcott, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, WV, for Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-94-271-1 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access