Maritime Delimitation Disputes and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution (2006)

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel
Section: Part II: Supranational Dispute Resolution
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/maritime-delimitation-disputes-convention-445341
Id. vLex: VLEX-445341

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

1) Introduction: -2) Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone. -3) Exclusive Economic Zone. -4) Continental Shelf: i) The US Submerged Lands Act. ii) The Truman Declaration. iii) Provisions of UNCLOS III. -5) Delimitation. -6) Two Cases Illustrating Maritime Delimitation. -7) The Framework Agreement Between Britain and Norway Relating to the Laying of Inter-connecting Submarine Pipelines.

Extract:

Maritime Delimitation Disputes and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention

1) Introduction

For the purposes of the Manual, maritime delimitation disputes can be divided into three areas: those concerning

* the territorial sea and the contiguous zone;

* the exclusive economic zone;

* the continental shelf.

These areas are dealt with in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III). It will be recalled that in an earlier chapter it was suggested that there were three international treaties that have a particular relevance to maritime disputes, international investment disputes and international trade disputes generally: UNCLOS III, the International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID Convention) and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention).

As in the case of territorial boundary disputes, the international dispute settlement bodies dealing with maritime boundary disputes are likely to include the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), both in The Hague. In addition, UNLCOS III set up a third international body dealing specifically with maritime disputes: the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).

While the concept of the freedom of the high seas is accepted internationally, it is similarly accepted that coastal states have rights in relation to the seas off their coasts and that the resources in the seas and on the seabed need to be exploited. This can lead to disputes concerning the delimitation of the territorial sea between States with opposite or adjacent coasts, disputes concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf and disputes concerning exclusive economic zones. What may well lie behind a maritime delimitation dispute, as with a land dispute, is the existence - or suspected existence - of an oil and/or gas field.

Various conferences have been held that sought to deal with these potentially conflicting areas of interest. These conferences led to the 1958 Conventions on the territorial sea and contiguous zone; the high seas; the continental shelf; and fishing and conservation of the living resources of the high seas, and then subsequently to UNCLOS III. The Preamble to the 1982 Convention sets the scene (see Box 5).

Box 5: Preamble to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

The States Parties to this Convention:

"Prompted by the desire to settle, in a spirit of mutual understanding and cooperation, all issues relating to the law of the sea and aware of the historic significance of this Convention as an important contribution to the maintenance of peace, justice ...

see the complete text now
If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:



Documentos Relacionados:


A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

Investor-State Disputes and Investment Treaty Arbitration

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) Introduction. -2) Bilateral Investment Treaties: the Japan-Vietnam Agreement. -3) The ICSID Convention: i) Introduction. ii) The Convention. -4) Some Problems Arising in Investor-State Disputes:...

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

Territorial Disputes

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) Introduction. -2) Intertemporal Law and Critical Dates. -3) Direct Methods of Acquisition of Title - Roots of Title: i) Treaties. ii) Uti Possidetis. iii) Decisions of International Courts and T...

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

The International Court of Justice

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) Introduction. -2) Historical Overview. -3) The Charter of the United Nations. -4) The Charter of the International Court of Justice. -5) ICJ Rules of Court. -6) Practice Directions of the ICJ. -...

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

International Conventions Dealing with Dispute Resolution

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) UNCLOS III. -2) The ICSID / Washington Convention. -3) The New York Convention.

Other documents:
juzgadodeinstruccionnumerotresdepamplona- edicto | discover wisconsin discovers waushara county | resolucion de 27 de febrero de 1998 de la direccion general de trafico por la que se convoca curso para obtener el certificado de aptitud de dire... | Arrêt of IIe Cour de Droit Social of Tribunal Federal Nº C 85/06 of October 16 2006 | Home Games Give Canada Optimism at World Event | ordinanze ordinaria nº 979 of consiglio di stato, of february 22, 2008 | 27 CFR 26.191 Notice of shipment. | Prestacao de contas do ano de 2003 - Prestacao de contas do ano de 2003 | LJN: AU4639, Rechtbank 's-Hertogenbosch, 133126 KG ZA 05-696 | Less Number of Foreigners Doing Biz in Goa [Goa] | stopford v her majesty the queen 2001 fct 887 2001

Previous | Table of Contents | Next