Martin Thompson v James Pokasui and The Electoral Commission [1988] PNGLR 210

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
JudgeHinchliffe J:
Judgment Date29 November 1988
CourtSupreme Court
Citation[1988] PNGLR 210
Year1988
Judgement NumberSC359

Full Title: Martin Thompson v James Pokasui and The Electoral Commission [1988] PNGLR 210

Supreme Court: Bredmeyer J, Cory J, Hinchliffe J

Judgment Delivered: 29 November 1988

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

[SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE]

MARTIN THOMPSON

V

JAMES POKASUI AND THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION

Waigani

Bredmeyer Cory Hinchliffe JJ

29 November 1988

PARLIAMENT — Elections — Disputed election petition — Practice and procedure — Particulars — No power to request or order particulars — No power to strike out a petition for failure to supply particulars — Organic Law on National Elections (Ch No 1), ss 208 (a), 212.

Held

The National Court has no power to order particulars in respect of an election petition filed pursuant to s 206 of the Organic Law on National Elections (Ch No 1) and consequently no power to dismiss a petition for failure to supply particulars.

SCR No 4 of 1982; Re Delba Biri v Bill Ginbogl Ninkama [1982] PNGLR 342, followed.

Re Koroba-Lake Kopiago Open Parliamentary Election; Wabiri v Payale Elo [1977] PNGLR 328, disapproved.

Cases Cited

Berrill's Petition and Boothby (SA), Re (1978) 52 ALJR 359; 19 ALR 254.

Koroba-Lake KopiaKo Open Parliamentary Election, Re; Wabiri 1, Payale Elo [1977] PNGLR 328.

SCR No 4 of 1982; Re Delba Biri v Bill Ginbogl Ninkama [1982] PNGLR 342.

Siaguru v Unagi and the Electoral Commissioner [1987] PNGLR 372.

Application

This was an application for judicial review under s 155 (2) (b) of the Constitution of an order of Woods J dismissing an election petition.

Counsel

L Gavara-Nanu, for the applicants.

M Kanat, for the first respondent.

No appearance for the second respondent.

29 November 1988

BREDMEYER J: This is an application for judicial review under s 155 (2) (b) of theConstitution. On 5 February 1988 Woods J dismissed an election petition for failure to comply with a request for particulars. Although the trial judge said that he was dismissing the petition for lack of prosecution it is clear that he was dismissing it because, as alleged in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
10 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT