E. J. Matranga, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant., 563 F.2d 677 (5th Cir. 1977)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (November 18, 1977)

Docket number: 77-1120


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/matranga-travelers-insurance-company-36866003
Id. vLex: VLEX-36866003

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Lydia B. Anderson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of California, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee., 727 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Northridge Bank, Plaintiff, v. Community Eye Care Center, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard E. Galecki, Jonathan N. Weber, John G. Gonis, Arthur M. Greve, Spencer Thomas, and Small Business Administration, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees., 655 F.2d 832 (7th Cir. 1981)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beech Street Corporation, Unisys Corporation, Defendants-Appellees., 208 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2000)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Ex Rel., Toni R. Barron; Vicky J. Scheel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P.; Deloitte & Touche Consulting Group, L.L.C.; Deloitte & Touche Consulting Group Holding, L.L.C.; Medicaid Claim Solutions of Texas, Inc.; National Heritage Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellees., 381 F.3d 438 (5th Cir. 2004)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Marsaw vs. Thompson (5th Cir. 2005)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Medicare&Medicaid Gu 34,507 Richard D. Bushman, Et Al., Appellants, v. Joseph E. Seiler, Et Al., Appellees., 755 F.2d 653 (8th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Nu-Air Manufacturing Company, a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank B. Hall & Co. of New York, a Corporation Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of New York, Doing Business as Intercredit Agency, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Inc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 822 F.2d 987 (11th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - DEL CAMPO V AMERICAN CORRECTIVE COUNSELING (9th Cir. 2008)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - 4 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 216, Medicare&Medicaid Gu 33,636 Rochester Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation, Appellee, v. the Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Appellant. Rochester Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation, Appellee, v. the Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Appellant, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rochester Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation, Appellant, v. the Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Appellees., 728 F.2d 1006 (8th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - United States of America, Qui Tam for Frank E. Body, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 156 F.3d 1098 (11th Cir. 1998)

Text:

Robert E. Hauberg, U. S. Atty., Joseph E. Brown, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Fred A. Ross, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

Before COLEMAN and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges, and NIXON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Travelers Insurance Company, defendant below, is a contract carrier through which the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare administers the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. 1395c-1395qq (1970) (amended 1976). Travelers brings this interlocutory appeal, 28 U.S.C. 1292(b), from the district court's denial of its motion for summary judgment, contending that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Travelers under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We agree and direct the district court to enter judgment for the appellant.

Dr. E. J. Matranga, a podiatrist in Jackson, Mississippi, filed this action on the theory that Travelers was liable to him for willful and wanton misconduct in processing Medicare claims that he had submitted to Travelers to cover professional services rendered to nursing home patients. Travelers' misconduct was alleged to be the improper withholding of payments to Dr. Matranga and the referral of his case to the Social Security Administration for investigation.

We held in Peterson v. Weinberger, 508 F.2d 45, 51-52 (5th Cir. 1975), and Peterson v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, 508 F.2d 55 (5th Cir. 1975), that the district court lacks jurisdiction over such Medicare fiscal intermediaries as Travelers under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Medicare Act authorizes the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to provide for the administration of the Act through contract "carriers." 42 U.S.C. 1395u (1970) (amended 1976). Travelers is such a carrier. Although Travelers makes determinations of amounts to be paid on claims and disburses funds provided by the government, the United States is the real party in interest. 20 C.F.R. § 405.670 (1977).

Travelers was acting under the direction of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and there is nothing in the record to indicate that Travelers was acting outside the perimeters of its official duties in its dealings with Dr. Matranga. The district court erred in declining to grant Travelers' motion for summary judgment. The district court, therefore, is directed to enter judgment for the appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

* District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access