McManus v. Arlington County Va (4th Cir. 1996)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (August 12, 1996)

Docket number: 96-6802


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/mcmanus-v-arlington-county-18207824
Id. vLex: VLEX-18207824

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6802

CHARLES PATRICK MCMANUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Arlington County

in the State of Virginia; SHERIFF FAUST,

Sheriff of Arlington County Jail at Arlington;

DAVID M. BOGARD, Dir ector of Corrections at the Arlington County Jail; CAPTAIN PINSON,

Captain of the Guard at Arlington County Jail;

CAPTAIN SITES, Captain of the Guard at Arling-

ton County Jail; JOHN DOE, Officer, Member of

the Hearing Committee at the Arlington County

Jail; JOHN DOE, Civilian member of the Hearing

Committee at the Arlington County Jail; COR-

RECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS, Medical Contractor

at the Arlington County Jail; LARRY LINTON,

Director of Correctional Medical Systems at

Arlington County Jail; JOHN DOE, Doctor at the

Arlington County Jail; JANE DOE, Nurse at the

Arlington County Jail; JOHN DOE, Head of Food

Service at the Arlington County Jail; JOHN

DOE, Food Service Manager at the Arlington

County Jail; JOHN DOE, Dentist at the Arling-

ton County Jail, all of the defendants are

being sued in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1004-2)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 12, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Patrick McManus, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access