Mind-Control Experimentation: A Travesty of Human Rights in theUnited States

The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice - Nbr. 9-1, October 2005

Evangeline Wright - University ofIowa College of Law
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/mind-experimentation-travesty-theunited-445641
Id. vLex: VLEX-445641

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Previous | Nbr. 9-1, October 2005

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

I. Introduction II. Mind-Control Experimentation In The United States A. Project Paperclip B. MKULTRA Project: Experiments Using Adult Subjects 1. The LSD Experiments 2. The Cameron Experiments on Adults C. MKULTRA Project: Experiments Using Children 1. Survivor Narratives 2. Corroborating Evidence ofExperimentation on Children III. Justice For Mind-Controlexperimentation Survivors A. Litigation 1. Criminal Law 2. Civil Law B. Remedies Outside the Court System IV. Survivorrealities

Citations:

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 1111 - Sec. 1111. Murder

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 3283 - Sec. 3283. Offenses against children

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 3282 - Sec. 3282. Offenses not capital

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 3281 - Sec. 3281. Capital offenses

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 3238 - Sec. 3238. Offenses not committed in any district


See all quotations

Extract:

Mind-Control Experimentation: A Travesty of Human Rights in theUnited States

Evangeline Wright, J.D. 2005, University ofIowa College of Law. Special thanks to Joanne, without whom this Note would not have been written.

I. Introduction

Our govemment, under the auspices of the CrA and U.S. military, has committed severe human rights violations that require a public apology and restitution. From the end ofWorId War II through the 1970s, the United States govemment engaged in mind-control experimentation on human subjects, both adults and children. 1 These experiments included the use of drugs, hypnosis, electroshock, sexual abuse, and torture.2 Justice remains elusive for those who have been the victims of these experiments. No one knows how many people were subjected to ilIegal and inhumane experiments by the U.S. government.3 Much of the documentatiori of these experiments has been destroyed.4 Documentation of other experiments has not been released, ostensibly for national security reasons.5 An extremely small percentage of mind-control experimentation victims have received settlements under· the Federal Tort Claims Act.6 The majority ofvictims have received nothing.7 None ofthe child victims, now adults, have received compensation for the wrongs they suffered.8 The names and stories of the survivors are, for the most part, not found in court documents, government documents, or mainstream media reports. Instead, their stories are told in web postings and the notes of mental health workers, the outlets available to the marginalized and ignored.9

In the past ten years, increasing numbers of mind-control experimentation survivors have begun to tell their stories.10 As knowledge of these atrocities filters into the public consciousness, hopefully these survivors wilI begin to receive compensation for the pain they have suffered. Mind-control survivors face many obstacles in their pursuit ofjustice, obstacles that must be overcome if we as a society hope to maintain our ideal of equal justice for aH citizens. Given the difficulty of proving the link between specific mind-control survivors and CIA documentation of mind-control experiments, and the length of time which many victims have needed in order to learn what has been done to them, there are significant legal obstacles to obtaining justice. We as a society are reluctant to look beyond our assumptions of humanity and acknowledge the inhumanity ofwhich we are capable.

The tremendous violation of human rights that these experiments represent demands some form of restitution. Survivors of CIA and military mind-control experiments are entitled to both civil and criminal remedies. They deserve a public apology for what was done to them; their experiences must become an acknowledged part of the history of this country. It is our responsibility, as members of the society that permitted these experiments to take place, to insure that these survivors' needs are met. This Note will examine only the United States government's responsibility for the cornmission of these experiments. The liability and wrongdoing of private institutions and individuals, a further avenue of justice for survivors of mind·control experiments, is not within the scope of this note. Part 11 of this Note will discuss the mind-control experiments, including the connection between these experiments and Nazi Germany, and specific experiments performed on adults and children. Part III will address the ways in which mind-control experimentation survivors may seek justice, both through the court system and through legislation.

II. Mind-Control Experimentation In The United States

Mind-control experimentation conducted by United States inteHigence services appears to have begun around the time of WorId War 11. 11 Prior to WorId War 11, the Office of Strategic Services set up a "truth drug" cornmittee that experimented with the effects of mescaline, various barbiturates, and scopolamine on humans before settling on marijuana and beginning a human testing program in 1943.12 Experimenters administered marijuana to human subjects in order to lower the subjects' inhibitions and cause them to speak more freely...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
Kuwait of Africa? | S3 Powers HP Pavilion Home PC Line with Leading-Edge Graphics and Video Acceleration Hewlett-Packard Company Join... | resolucion int/3256/2005, de 10 de noviembre, de convocatoria de concurso especifico de meritos y capacidades para la p... | Inversiones Rosaro Sociedad Limitada | Arrêté du 21 septembre 1992 portant remise de débets | Vredegerecht van het eerste kanton Kortrijk Bij beschikking van de vrederechter ... | Bekanntmachung vorgeschrieben durch Artikel 74 des Sondergesetzes vom 6. ... | arret cour d appel de lyon n 2002/02086 june 26 2002 | Japón anticipa el peor escenario | decreti decisorio nº 1949 of t.a.r. - toscana - firenze, of may 05, 2006 | Anuncio n 14/2009 2 Juizo do Tribunal de Comercio de Vila Nova de Gaia de 02 de Janeiro de 2009 | acordao indexados n rr-641707-2000-04 of , of october 10, 2003 | Acuerdo Nº 1838-9/2003 of 2º Grau - Quarta Câmara Cível, of February 11, 2009 | Decisao Monocratica N 2006/0050957-7 of Superior Tribunal de Justica Sexta Turma of April 26 2007

Previous | Nbr. 9-1, October 2005