American Motorists Insurance Co., and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. American Employers' Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 78-3043. Summary Calendar. [Fn*], 600 F.2d 15 (5th Cir. 1979)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (August 03, 1979)

Docket number: 78-3043


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/motorists-fire-marine-employers-78-38390047
Id. vLex: VLEX-38390047

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Variable Annuity Life Insurance co. v. David Adel (11th Cir. 2006)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Felix Manuel Reyes-Lopez, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Misener Marine Construction Co., Et Al., Defendants, Appellants. New Hampshire Insurance Company, Defendant, Appellee., 854 F.2d 529 (1st Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - D. J. Mcduffie, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Old Reliable Fire Insurance Co. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 608 F.2d 145 (5th Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, Plaintiff, v. Pargas, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, v. Union Tank Car Co., Third Party Defendant-Appellee., 706 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Teal Energy Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gt, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Gt, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teal Energy Usa, Inc.; Et Al., Defendants, Teal Energy Usa, Inc., Defendant-Appellant., 369 F.3d 873 (5th Cir. 2004)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Norman T. Strain, D/B/a Trans Texas Tire, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. Harrelson Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee. No. 84-1219. Summary Calendar., 742 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded By and a Division of Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Insurance Company of North America, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 841 F.2d 1254 (5th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Leroy Stewart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Gary D. Nuss, and Rockwell International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees., 716 F.2d 755 (10th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vest Transportation Company, Inc., and Victory Towing Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. Switzerland General Insurance Corporation of New York, Defendant-Appellee., 666 F.2d 932 (5th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Bess Caroline Molett, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Son, John Dreisch Molett, Iv, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Penrod Drilling Co., Et Al., Defendants. Gearench, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Columbus-Mckinnon, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellant., 872 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir. 1989)

Text:

Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, James H. Roussel, George A. Gaitas, New Orleans, La., for St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.

Charles F. Lozes, Alan L. Offner, New Orleans, La., for American Motorists.

Frank M. Brame, Lake Charles, La., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

Before GOLDBERG, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The parties in this action, three insurance companies, each contributed funds in settlement of a tort action brought against their common insured. Two of the companies then brought this declaratory judgment action against the third to determine the companies' respective liabilities under the settlement agreement. The district court entered a judgment from which the plaintiffs appeal.

This court sua sponte raises a question concerning its subject matter jurisdiction. The alleged jurisdictional basis for this action is diversity of citizenship. When jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the plaintiff's complaint must specifically allege each party's citizenship, and these allegations must show that the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states. McGovern v. American Airlines, Inc., 511 F.2d 653 (5th Cir. 1975).

In this case the plaintiffs' complaint simply alleged that all three parties were "foreign corporations" which were "licensed to do business and doing business in Louisiana." It failed, however, to specify the citizenship of the parties.[fn1] Because of this defect in the pleadings, we cannot tell if in fact the parties are diverse. Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for it to determine if there is jurisdiction. It can do this by giving the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their defective pleadings. See 28 U.S.C. § 1653. Of course, if the amendments show that there is no diversity of citizenship, the district court must dismiss the action.

REMANDED.

[fn*] Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

[fn1] For purposes of determining diversity of citizenship a corporation is deemed "a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business . . .." 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c). The plaintiffs are required to provide this information in their pleadings.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access