La Prensa San Diego (October 03, 2008)
Author: Schrag, Peter
Vol: 32, Issue: 40
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/needs-dream-act-ever-recent-decision-65453747
Id. vLex: VLEX-65453747
Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días
The ruling, by members of the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento, upholds the contention of out-of-state students and their parents that under federal law, the University of California, California State University and the California community colleges may not give illegal alien students benefits they don't grant citizens and legal residents from other states. They call it an "illegal alien tuition scheme." UC and its co-defendants maintain that California's tuition policy, enacted in 2001, doesn't discriminate. It simply sets the same in-state fees for all California residents who graduated from a California high school and attended one the prior three years, regardless of their immigration status.
"The three-year attendance requirement at a California high school," the court said, "is a surrogate residence requirement." The California law's requirement that the illegal alien student "will file an application (for legalization) as soon as he or she is eligible to do so," the judges said, is meaningless.California Needs 'Dream Act' Now More Than Ever with Recent Court Decision
The three-judge decision earlier this month that jeopardizes tuition breaks for thousands of California's illegal alien college students may be legally correct. But it's likely to lead to a self-defeating economic strategy the nation will regret.
The ruli...Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access
If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here