Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Nelly Uribe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Los Angeles Police Department; Darryl Gates, Police Chief; County of Los Angeles; Ronald W. Reagan, Former President of the United States; Nancy Reagan, Former 1St Lady; George Bush, President, of the United States; Dan Quayle, Vice President, of the United States, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. Nelly Uribe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Los Angeles Police Department; Ronald W. Reagan, Former President of the United States; Nancy Reagan, Former 1St Lady; George Bush, President, of the United States; Dan Quayle, Vice President, of the United States, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 951 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1991)

Federal Circuits, 9th Cir. (December 20, 1991)

Docket number: 91-55339

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/nelly-uribe-quayle-37415453
Id. vLex: VLEX-37415453

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,438 Frank Denny, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. Barber, James H. Binger, Willard C. Butcher, John T. Connor, C. W. Cook, J. Richardson Dilworth, Patricia Roberts Harris, Theodore M. Hesburgh, William R. Hewlett, J. K. Jamieson, Ralph Lazarus, Robert D. Lilley, Leonor F. Loree, Ii, John H. Loudon, Jeremiah Milbank, Charles F. Myers, Jr., James A. Perkins, David Rockefeller, J. Henry Smith, Whitney Stone, John E. Swearingen, the Chase Manhattan Corporation and Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Defendants-Appellees., 576 F.2d 465 (2nd Cir. 1978)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Thomas A. Jones, Jr., Dba T.A. Jones & Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles; Edward Helfeld, Joe L. Shugart, Jerome H. Gross, Walter Preston, Harold L. White, Norman Rosenfeldt, Jackson Chin, George Kantar, Patricia A. Davenport, Fremont Indemnity Company, Inc., a Corporation, American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., a Corporation, and United Inspection Bureau, a Corporation, Defendants-Appellees., 733 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1984) Jr., Dba T.A. Jones & Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles; Edward Helfeld, Joe L. Shugart, Jerome H. Gross, Walter Preston, Harold L. White, Norman Rosenfeldt, Jackson Chin, George Kantar, Patricia A. Davenport, Fremont Indemnity Company, Inc., a Corporation, American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., a Corporation, and United Inspection Bureau, a Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Steven M. de Long, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael Hennessey, Respondent-Appellee. Steven M. de Long, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Ruth Mansfield; Gloria Gonzales; Patricia Denning; Public Health Department of the City & County of San Francisco; and Community Mental Health Services, Defendants-Appellees., 912 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1990) Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael Hennessey, Respondent-Appellee. Steven M. de Long, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Ruth Mansfield; Gloria Gonzales; Patricia Denning; Public Health Department of the City & County of San Francisco; and Community Mental Health Services, Defendants-Appellees.

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Text:

Before SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge.**

MEMORANDUM***

After the district court allowed Uribe to amend her original complaint, she filed two more; these complaints, like the first, do not contain a "short and plain statement of the claim" as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2) and therefore do not provide fair notice. See Jones v. Community Redevelopment Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir.1984). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 471 (2d Cir.1978).

The district court also required Uribe to obtain leave from the court before filing any new actions. Before imposing such a limitation, a court must give notice, create an adequate record for review and make substantive findings of frivolousness; furthermore, the court must narrowly tailor its order. De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147-48 (9th Cir.1990). The district court here did not comply with these requirements. We therefore vacate this portion of the district court's order; if on remand the court wishes to impose a limitation on Uribe's right to bring new suits, it first must make findings in accord with De Long.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

** The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., United States District Judge, District of Nevada, sitting by designation

*** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3