Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons International Union, Local Union No. 685, Aflcio, Defendant-Appellant., 472 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1973)

Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (January 15, 1973)

Docket number: 72-2890


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/operative-plasterers-masons-aflcio-38373621
Id. vLex: VLEX-38373621

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Wickham Contracting Co., Inc. and Ralph Perone, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. the Board of Education of the City of New York, Hugh Mcclaren, Jr., Thomas Van Arsdale and Bernard Rosenberg, Defendants-Cross-Appellees, Local Union Number 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee., 715 F.2d 21 (2nd Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Clark Engineering and Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellant v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Four Rivers District Council, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 510 F.2d 1075 (6th Cir. 1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Cecil L. Kinty, D/B/a Kinty Trucking Company, Appellee, v. United Mine Workers of America, Appellant. Ruth M. Kittle, Individually and as Administratrix With Will Annexed of Theestate of Bertsell Kittle, Deceased, Appellee, v. United Mine Workers of America, Appellant. Thomas J. Gates, D/B/a Dorothy Coal Company and Gates Trucking Company, Appellee, v. United Mine Workers of America, Appellant. Lawrence Layman, D/B/a Layman Coal Company, Appellee, v. United Mine Workers of America, Appellant. Josephine Lacare, Widow of Original Plaintiff Orlanda Lacare, Et Al.,Appellees, v. United Mine Workers of America, Appellant., 544 F.2d 706 (4th Cir. 1976)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - Consolidated Express, Inc., Appellant, v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., Sea-Land Services, Inc., Seatrain Lines Inc., International Longshoremen'S Association, Afl-Cio, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John M. Mcgrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp., United Terminals Corp., Universal Maritime Services Corp. Twin Express, Inc., Appellant, v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., Sea-Land Service, Inc., International Longshoremen'S Association, Afl-Cio, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John M. Mcgrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp., United Terminals Corp., Universal Maritime Services Corp., 602 F.2d 494 (3rd Cir. 1979)

Text:

C. Paul Barker, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

Oliver J. Butler, Jr., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case raises again before this circuit the question of whether the determination by the National Labor Relations Board that a union had committed an unfair labor practice in violation of the National Labor Relations Act is res judicata in a subsequent suit for damages under Section 303 of the Labor-Management Relations Act. In this case the NLRB held that the appellant union violated Section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) by engaging in certain unprotected secondary activity affecting appellee Texaco. The District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, 343 F.Supp. 267, held this NLRB decision res judicata on the issue of liability and conducted a trial only on the question of damages. Texaco was awarded damages in excess of $24,000.00, and the union now appeals. We affirm.

We note that the NLRB finding of illegal secondary activity in this case was challenged by the union in an enforcement proceeding before this court and that we granted enforcement of the order. National Labor Relations Board v. Lafayette Building & Construction Trades Council, 5 Cir. 1971, 445 F.2d 495.

While the result of applying res judicata in this case may seem harsh, especially since there are some definite differences between Board and court proceedings, we feel that affirmance is compelled by the existing case law in this circuit. Painters v. Edgewood Contracting Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 1081; H. L. Robertson & Associates, Inc. v. Plumbers Local 519, 5 Cir. 1970, 429 F.2d 520. We feel that these two cases are in point on the issue raised in this case and therefore the opinion of the district court is affirmed.

* Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access