Paul Marinda v The Independent State of Papua New Guinea

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
JudgeWoods J
Judgment Date20 December 1991
Citation(1991) N1026
CourtNational Court
Year1991
Judgement NumberN1026

Full Title Paul Marinda v The The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (1991) N1026

National Court: Woods J

Judgment Delivered: 20 December 1991

N1026

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

[NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]

WS 424 OF 1991

PAUL MARINDA

V

THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Mount Hagen

Woods J

13 December 1991

20 December 1991

PRACTICE — Suit against State — Default Judgement requires strict compliance — Effect of non-compliance with Claims By and Against The State Act ch.30 — Default Judgement discretionary not mandatory — Writ of Summons not served properly — Default Judgement refused.

Counsel:

D. Poka for the Plaintiff

20 December 1991

WOODS J: The Plaintiff has issued a Writ of Summons against the State claiming damages for false arrest and assault by members of the Police acting in the cause of their duties. The Writ was served on the State by service on an officer in the employ of the State Solicitor's Office. Service of process on the State is provided for under The Claims By and Against The State Act Ch 30 sec.4 which reads; Service of process where State is a Party.

Where the State is a party to a suit, all process in the suit required to be served on it shall be served

a) On the Principal Legal Adviser or

b) In respect of a suit brought in a District Court on

1) The Principal Legal Adviser or

2) A person appointed by the Minister to receive service.

Therefore according to that act the service by the Plaintiff on an Officer in the Department of Justice is not proper service on the State.

The State has failed to file a Notice of Intention to Defend and Defence to the Writ and the Plaintiff is therefore seeking judgement by default on liability for damages to be assessed.

Judgement by default is a rather draconian procedure being as it is in the absence of the other party. In effect it arises...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 practice notes
16 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT