King World Productions, Inc. and Camelot Entertainment Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Financial News Network, Defendant-Appellant., 834 F.2d 267 (2nd Cir. 1987)

Federal Circuits, 2nd Cir. (November 24, 1987)

Docket number: 87-7512

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/productions-camelot-entertainment-network-37182230
Id. vLex: VLEX-37182230

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Antonio Duran Salazar, Defendant-Appellant., 945 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir. 1991)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Curtis Taylor, Defendant-Appellant., 18 F.3d 55 (2nd Cir. 1994)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - USA v. Watson [Summ. Ord.] (2nd Cir. 2006)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - USA v. Riley (2nd Cir. 2006)

Ohio Supreme Court - State v. Martin (Ohio 2004)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Adrian Riley, Defendant-Appellant., 452 F.3d 160 (2nd Cir. 2006)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Jose Muniz, Defendant-Appellant., 60 F.3d 65 (2nd Cir. 1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Harold Cattouse, Defendant-Appellant., 846 F.2d 144 (2nd Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. William Perez, A/K/a 'Willo,' Lillian Perez, A/K/a 'Lee,' and Luis Garcia, A/K/a 'Weo,' Defendants-Appellants., 904 F.2d 142 (2nd Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Wilson L. Harville, D/B/a Harville Yachts, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the Yacht Contessa, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Fari Sabahi, in Personam, Defendants-Appellees., 988 F.2d 119 (9th Cir. 1993)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Kenneth G. Roberts, Roberts & Moelis, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Paul H. Appel, Friedman, Leeds, Shorenstein & Armenakis, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, WINTER and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Weinfeld in his opinions of May 15, 1987, 660 F.Supp. 1381, and of June 4, 1987, --- F.Supp. ---- (S.D.N.Y.1987).

Appellees' request for an award of post-judgment fees and other costs is not before us on this appeal and is therefore denied.

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /